摘要
本文以照旷阁《学津讨原》本为底本,参校《知不足斋丛书》本、《武林掌故丛编》本等五版本,对《梦粱录》文字校勘存在的诸多可商之处,择其数例加以论述。
Xue jin tao yuan Edition of Zhao kuangge is taken as the original text, together with the materials from Zhi bu zu cong shu and Wu lin zhang gu cong bian etc. five different versions. The study finds that there are still some oversights in interpretation for various reasons. Some complements are chosen and analyzed in this paper.
作者
阚海娟
KAN Haijuan(Yunnan Vocational College of Culture and Art,Kunming 650111,China)
出处
《四川职业技术学院学报》
2019年第6期96-100,共5页
Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College
基金
云南文化艺术职业学院校级课题“《梦粱录》校勘研究”(2019B07)
