期刊文献+

加速康复外科在肝门部胆管癌围手术期中的疗效分析 被引量:6

Clinical observation of the application of enhanced recovery after surgery in treating hilarcholangiocarcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨加速康复外科理念(ERAS)在肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)围手术期中的可行性与安全性。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年1月48例HCCA患者,其中25例患者围手术期行加速康复外科处理(ERAS组),23例患者围手术期进行传统处理(传统组),采用SPSS 19.0软件进行统计分析。术中术后各项指标、术后疼痛评分、患者满意度采用(x±s)表示,独立t检验;术后并发症等使用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果两组术前生化指标TBiL、ALT、AST、ALB无差异,术后第7天ERAS组TBiL、ALT、AST显著低于传统组,而ALB显著高于传统组(P<0.05);ERAS组术后首次排气时间、术后平均住院时间、医疗费用均显著减少(P<0.05)。ERAS组术后并发症2例(8%)低于传统组9例(39.1%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在HCCA围手术期中实施ERAS模式是可行的、安全有效的,有助于加快患者术后康复、有利于改善患者预后。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of the application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS)in the perioperative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma(HCCA).Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 48 patients with HCCA and underwent surgical treatment from January 2015 to January 2018.Among them,there were 25 cases underwent ERAS perioperative management(ERAS group),while 23 cases underwent traditionally perioperative management(traditional group).Statistical analysis were performed by using spss 19.0 software.Measurement data,such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators,postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction were expressed as(x±s),and were examined by using independent t test.Count data such as complication rates were examined by chi square test.A P value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.Results There was no significant difference in terms of TBIL,ALT,AST and ALB between two groups before operation.However on the 7th day after operation,the TBIL,ALT,AST were significantly lower and ALB was significantly higher in ERAS group than those in traditional group respectively(P<0.05).The first anal exsufflation time,postoperative hospital stay,and medical costs were significantly lower in ERAS group than those in traditional group respectively(P<0.05).There were 2 cases(8%)of postoperative complications occurred in ERAS group,which were significantly lower than 9 cases(39.1%)in traditional group.Conclusions It is feasible,safe and effective that perioperative ERAS management in treating HCCA,which is helpful to accelerate the postoperative recovery and could improve the prognosis of patients.
作者 郭强 吐尔干艾力·阿吉 徐成 冉博 蒋铁民 张瑞青 邵英梅 Guo Qiang;Tuerganailio·Aji;Xu Cheng;Ran Bo;Jiang Tiemin;Zhang Ruiqing;Shao Yingmei(Department of Hepatobiliary&Hydatid Diseases,Digestive&Vascular Surgery Center,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Xinjiang 830054,China)
出处 《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》 2020年第1期20-23,共4页 Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区“十三五”重点学科(高峰学科)【新教研(2016)7号】 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2018D01C220) 国家自然科学基金(81660108) 国家重点专项(2017YFC0909903) 省部共建中亚高发病成因与防治国家重点实验室(SKL-HIDCA-2017-1)~~
关键词 胆管肿瘤 康复 围手术期 疗效比较研究 Bile duct neoplasms Rehabilitation Perioperative Comparative effectiveness research
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献79

共引文献666

同被引文献94

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部