期刊文献+

肿瘤标志物对肝内胆管细胞癌患者发生淋巴结转移的预测效果研究 被引量:4

Study on the predictive effect of tumor markers on lymph node metastasis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肿瘤标志物(CEA、AFP、CA19-9、CA125、CA211和CA242)对肝内胆管细胞癌(ICC)患者发生淋巴结转移的预测效果。方法选取我院2013年2月至2018年2月收治的102例ICC患者为研究对象。根据手术后病理学检查结果是否存在淋巴转移分为淋巴结转移组(n=36)和非淋巴结转移组(n=66)。术前所有患者均行肿瘤标志物检测。结果淋巴结转移组血清CA19-9、CA125、CA211和CA242阳性率分别为83.3%、47.2%、77.8%和69.4%,非淋巴结转移组分别为50.0%、30.3%、59.1%和48.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组血清CEA和AFP阳性率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。淋巴结转移组血清CA19-9、CA125、CA211和CA242水平分别为(298.5±102.5)U/L、(71.5±33.5)U/L、(7.3±6.2)μg/L和(75.6±33.5)U/L,非淋巴结转移组分别为(55.9±26.5)U/L、(16.9±8.5)U/L、(3.8±2.1)μg/L和(13.5±6.8)U/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组血清CEA和AFP水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。采用ROC曲线评价术前血清CA19-9、CAl25、CA211和CA242对淋巴结转移的预测价值见图1,其曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.772(95%CI 0.666~0.878,0.000)、0.778(95%CI 0.678~0.879,0.000)、0.762(95%CI 0.651~0.889,0.000)和0.831(95%CI 0.729~0.932,0.000)。血清CA19-9、CAl25、CA211和CA242预测ICC患者淋巴结转移的性临界值分别为145.9 U/L、38.9 U/L、6.2μg/L和45.6U/L,敏感度分别为64.7%、72.5%、67.6%和76.5%,特异性分别为69.6%、65.7%、77.5%和79.4%。结论术前血清CA19-9、CAl25、CA211和CA242可作为预测ICC患者发生淋巴结转移的重要指标,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the predictive effect of tumor markers(CEA,AFP,CA19-9,CA125,CA211 and CA242)on lymph node metastasis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC).Methods 102 ICC patients who were admitted to our hospital from February 2013 to February 2018 were selected as the study subjects.Lymph node metastasis group(n=36)and non-lymph node metastasis group(n=66)were classified according to whether or not lymph node metastasis was found after surgery.All patients were examined before surgery for tumor markers.Results The positive rates of serum CA19-9,CA125,CA211,and CA242 in lymph node metastasis group were 83.3%,47.2%,77.8%,and 69.4%,respectively.The non-lymph node metastasis group was 50.0%,30.3%,59.1%,and 48.5%,respectively.And there were statistical significantly differences(P<0.05).There were no statistical significantly differences in the positive rate of serum CEA and AFP between the two groups(P>0.05).The levels of serum CA19-9,CA125,CA211,and CA242 in the lymph node metastasis group were(298.5±102.5)U/L,(71.5±33.5)U/L,(7.3±6.2)μg/L,and(75.6±33.5)U/L,non-lymph node metastases were(55.9±26.5)U/L,(16.9±8.5)U/L,(3.8±2.1)μg/L,and(13.5±6.8)U/L,respectively.There were statistical significantly differences between the two groups(P<0.05).There were no statistical significant difference in serum CEA and AFP levels between the two groups(P>0.05).The predictive value of preoperative serum CA19-9,CA25,CA211,and CA242 for lymph node metastasis using the ROC curve and the area under the curve(AUC)was 0.772(95%CI 0.666 to 0.878,P=0.000),0.778,respectively.(95%CI 0.678 to 0.879,P=0.000),0.762(95%CI 0.651 to 0.889,P=0.000)and 0.831(95%CI 0.729 to 0.932,P=0.000).Serum CA19-9,CA25,CA211,and CA242 predicted the criticality of lymph node metastasis in ICC patients was 145.9 U/L,38.9 U/L,6.2μg/L,and 45.6 U/L,respectively,and the sensitivity was 64.7%and 72.5%,respectively.,67.6%and 76.5%,with specificities of 69.6%,65.7%,77.5%,and 79.4%,respectively.Conclusion Preoperative serum CA19-9,CA25,CA211,and CA242 may serve as important predictors of lymph node metastasis in patients with ICC and are worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 郭育鹏 杜立学 Guo Yupeng;Du Lixue(Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Pucheng County Hospital,Weinan 715500,Shanxi,China;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Shanxi People's Hospital,Xian 710068,Shaanxi,China)
出处 《贵州医药》 CAS 2019年第12期1863-1866,共4页 Guizhou Medical Journal
关键词 肝内胆管细胞癌 肿瘤标志物 淋巴结转移 预测 Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Tumor markers Lymph node metastasis Prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献37

  • 1Dong-Yu Li,Hai-Bin Zhang,Ning Yang,Yuan Quan,Guang-Shun Yang.Routine lymph node dissection may be not suitable for all intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: Results of a monocentric series[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(47):9084-9091. 被引量:31
  • 2吕文平,董家鸿,李智华,陈平.肝细胞癌手术后应用不同分期评估预后的临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2007,22(7):514-517. 被引量:1
  • 3Yeh MM. Pathology of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma [J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2010,25(9):1485.
  • 4Cazals-Hatem D,Rebouissou S,Bioulac-Sage P,et al. Clinical and molecular analysis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas [J]. J Hepatol,2004,41(2):292-298.
  • 5Koh KC,Lee H,Choi MS,et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Am J Surg,2005,189(1):120-125.
  • 6Tang D,Nagano H,Nakamura M,et al. Clinical and pathological features of Allen’s type C classification of resected combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma:a comparative study with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2006,10(7):987-998.
  • 7Portolani N,Baiocchi GL,Coniglio A,et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma:a Western experience[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2008,15(7):1880-1890.
  • 8Park SE,Lee SH,Yang JD,et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg,2013,17(4):152-156.
  • 9Okuda K,Ohtsuki T,Obata H,et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients[J]. Cancer,1985,56(4):918-928.
  • 10Kudo M,Chung H,Osaki Y. Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score):its value and limitations,and a proposal for a new staging system,the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score)[J]. J Gastroenterol,2003,38(3):207-215.

共引文献27

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部