期刊文献+

老年Ⅲ期右半结肠癌经腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除治疗的临床效果及预后分析 被引量:25

The clinical outcomes and prognostic analysis of elderly patients with stage Ⅲ right colon cancer undergo laparoscopic complete mesocolon
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜下完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)治疗老年Ⅲ期右半结肠癌的临床效果及预后。方法收集兰州大学第一医院2010-2015年期间280例老年(≥60岁)Ⅲ期右半结肠癌患者的临床资料,其中160例患者接受腹腔镜下CME治疗(称为观察组),120例患者接受传统开腹右半结肠癌根治术(称为对照组)。对比2组患者的平均手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门首次排气时间、淋巴结清扫数目、阳性淋巴结数目、住院时间及术后并发症情况;分析2组术后局部复发率、远处转移率、3年累积生存率、无瘤生存率及术后复发相关危险因素。结果观察组患者手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、阳性淋巴结数目以及术后远处转移率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者术中出血量、术后肛门首次排气时间、住院时间和术后复发率少于或短于或低于对照组,其差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后3年累计生存率高于对照组(log-rank χ^2=11.865,P=0.001),观察组患者术后3年无瘤生存率高于对照组(log-rank χ^2=7.567,P=0.006);运用logistic回归分析2组患者术后复发的病例发现,肿瘤的分化程度、是否有脉管浸润及淋巴结转移是术后肿瘤复发的相关独立危险因素。结论老年Ⅲ期右半结肠癌经腹腔镜CME治疗效果好,手术安全、可行,可有效延长患者生存时间。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect and prognosis of laparoscopic complete mesocolic resection(CME) in the treatment of elderly patients with stage Ⅲ right colon cancer. Methods Clinical data of 280 elderly patients(aged 60 years or older) who underwent stage Ⅲ right hemicolectomy in the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from 2010 to 2015 were collected. Among them, 160 patients underwent laparoscopic CME treatment were set as the observation group, and 120 patients underwent conventional laparotomy were set as the control group. The mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative first anal exhaust time, number of lymph nodes dissection, number of positive lymph nodes, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.The postoperative local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, 3-year cumulative survival rate and postoperative recurrence risk factors were analyzed. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the observation group and the control group in operative time, number of lymph node dissection, number of positive lymph nodes and postoperative distant metastasis rate(P>0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal first exhaust time, days of hospitalization, and postoperative recurrence rate in the observation group were less or shorter or lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). The 3-year survival rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(log-rank χ^2 =11.865, P=0.001), and the disease free survival in the observation group was also higher than that in the control group(log-rank χ^2=7.567, P=0.006). Logistic regression was used to analyze the cases of postoperative recurrence in the two groups, and it was found that the degree of tumor differentiation, vascular invasion and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for postoperative tumor recurrence. Conclusion Laparoscopic CME in the treatment of elderly patients with stage Ⅲ right colon cancer is effective, it is safe and feasible, which can effectively prolong the survival time of patients.
作者 王芳红 张辉 储怀祝 朱克祥 张磊 孟文勃 赵思华 周文策 李汛 WANG Fanghong;ZHANG Hui;CHU Huaizhu;ZHU Kexiang;ZHANG Lei;MENG Wenbo;ZHAO Sihua;ZHOU Wence;LI Xun(The Second Department of General Surgery,The First Hospital of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Department of Surgical Oncology,Qinghai Provincial People’s Hospital,Xining,810000,P.R.China;The Fifth Department of General Surgery,The First Hospital of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Department of VIP Surgery,The First Hospital of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Cancer Center,The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China)
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2020年第1期69-74,共6页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 老年患者 Ⅲ期右半结肠癌 全结肠系膜切除 临床效果 elderly patients Stage Ⅲ right colon cancer complete mesocolic resection clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1汪路,孟庆勇,王小军,郑榜祥.结肠癌根治术后复发转移危险因素分析[J].中国肿瘤,2007,16(8):646-648. 被引量:21
  • 2吴在德, 吴肇汉. 外科学 [M]. 第7 版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2008:488-489.
  • 3中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术指南(2006 版) [J]. 外科理论与实践, 2006,5(11):462-464.
  • 4Medinger M, Steinbild S, Mross K. Adjuvant and palliativeanticancer treatment of colon carcinoma in 2004 [J]. Praxis (Bern1994), 2004, 93(40):1633-1644.
  • 5Mishima H, Ikenaga M, Tsujinaka T, et al. FOLFOX [J]. GanTo Kagaku Ryoho, 2006, 33(7):911-914.
  • 6Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomyfor cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial [J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246(4):655-662.
  • 7Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group[J]. J Clin Oncol,2007, 25(21):3061-3068.
  • 8Cummings LC, Delaney CP, Cooper GS. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population:a cohort study [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2012, 10:31.
  • 9Tanis E, van Geloven AA, Bemelman WA, et al. A comparison of short-term outcome after laparoscopic, transverse, and midline right-sided colectomy [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012 Jan 17.[Epub ahead of print].
  • 10Khan JS, Hemandas AK, Flashman KG, et al. Clinical outcome of laparoscopic and open colectomy for right colonic carcinoma [J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2011, 93(8):603-607.

共引文献85

同被引文献228

引证文献25

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部