期刊文献+

基于SCIE数据库省级农业院校科技论文分析评估研究——以内蒙古农业大学为例 被引量:1

Assessment and Research on Province-level Agricultural Colleges Scientific Papers Based on SCIE——Taking Inner Mongolia Agricultural University as Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本项目基于SCIE数据库,选取有代表性文献计量指标,引入权威性文摘数据库(Scopus),分析评估了近20年内蒙古农业大学科技论文的学科影响力和竞争力。本文借助文献计量领域的百分位数和EV值等方法评估和揭示出内蒙古农业大学的潜力学科,并对省级农业院校提出了建议。 Based on SCIE,selecting characteristic documentary indexes,introducing Scopus,the article analyzes the discipline influence and competence of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University scientific papers. The article reveals the potential disciplines using percentile and EV value,and also gives suggestions.
作者 闫险峰 YAN Xianfeng(Library,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Huhhot 010018,China)
出处 《晋图学刊》 2019年第6期73-79,共7页 Shanxi Library Journal
基金 2017年CALIS全国农学文献信息中心研究项目“基于SCIE数据库的内农大科技论文分析评估和接近ESI前1%潜力学科的揭示”(项目编号:201733)
关键词 SCIE 科技论文 分析评估 潜力学科 SCIE scientific papers analysis and assessment potential discipline
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献43

  • 1HEFCE. HEFCE : Publications Research Funding: Introduction [2012 - 02 - 13 ]. http://www 98_54. htm. : 1998 : Consultation 98/54 - of a Policy Factor [ EB/OL]. hefce, ac. uk/pubs/hefce/1998/.
  • 2Glanzel W, Thijs B, Schubert A, et al. Subfield - specific Nor- malized Relative Indicators and a New Generation of Relational Charts: Methodological Foundations Illustrated on the Assessment of Institutional Research Performance [ J ]. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(1) : 165 -188.
  • 3van Raan A F J. The Use of Bibliometric Analysis in Research Per- formanee Assessment and Monitoring of Interdisciplinary Scientific Developments [ J ]. Assessment Theory and Practice, 2003,1 ( 12 ) : 20 - 29.
  • 4Schubert A, Braun T. Relative Indicators and Relational Charts for Comparative Assessment of Publication Output and Citation Impact [J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(5) : 281 -291.
  • 5Schubert A, Braun T. Reference Standards for Citation Based As- sessments [J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 26(1): 21 -35.
  • 6Vinkler P. The Case of Seientometricians with the "Absolute Rela- tive" Impact Indicator [ J ]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012, 6 ( 2 ) : 254 - 264.
  • 7Vinkler P. Model for Quantitative Selection of Relative Scientomet- rie Impact Indicators [ J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36 (2) : 223 - 236.
  • 8Waltman L, van Eck N J, van Leeuwen T N, et al. Towards a New Crown Indicator: Some Theoretical Considerations [ J ]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5 ( 1 ) : 37 -47.
  • 9Leydesdorff L, Opthof T. Remaining Problems with the " New Crown Indicator" (MNCS) of the CWTS[J]. Journal oflnformet- tics, 2011,5(1): 224-225.
  • 10Gingras Y, Lariviere V. There are Neither "King" nor "Crown" in Scientometrics: Comments on A Supposed "Alternative" Method of Normalization [J]. Journal of lnformetrics, 2011, 5 (1): 226- 227.

共引文献89

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部