期刊文献+

项目后学习:环境影响后评价报告文本挖掘与分析 被引量:4

Learning from Post-Project Review:Text Mining and Analysis of Post Environmental Impact Review
原文传递
导出
摘要 项目后评价报告包含了大量的容易被忽视的隐性经验知识,是组织学习的重要知识来源。提出了一种基于LDA主题挖掘模型的经验学习方法,运用该方法,以环境影响后评价报告为数据来源,R语言作为分析工具,对隐含在项目环境影响后评价报告中的关键经验知识进行挖掘和分析;通过对重要主题进行筛选来明确样本所讨论的内容,对文档分类以明确样本每篇文档中所重点研究的内容,发现不同文档间的相似点;通过关键主题词分析,得出6条解决环境问题的重要经验知识,即预先制定全面的应急措施、从根源入手解决环境问题、实时关注作业区动态、从项目设备入手降低环境影响、重视沟通、考虑位置因素等;通过绘制主题关系网络图,不仅可以清楚主题间的关系,进一步可以得出隐含类环境经验知识主要来源于与"事故"相关的事件和项目本身。 The post-project evaluation report,which contains a lot of tacit experience knowledge easily neglected,is an important knowledge source of organizational learning.An empirical learning method based on LDA topic mining model was proposed.The key empirical knowledge implied in the post-project environmental impact review report was explored using R language.Analysis of the important topics was conducted to clarify the focus of the whole sample,and the research of document classification was carried out to clarify the key research contents in each document of sample and to find similarities between different documents.Through the analysis of key topic words,six important experience knowledge were obtained to solve environmental problems,including comprehensive emergency measures,search of root causes,focus on real-time operation dynamics,attention to project equipment,increased communication,and consideration of location factors.Analysis of the inter-topic network diagram show that tacit environmental knowledge originates from accident-related events and the project itself.
作者 王江 郝敏霞 WANG Jiang;HAO Min-xia(School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Chemical Technology,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《工业工程与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期173-179,194,共8页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(17BGL267)
关键词 LDA主题模型 环境影响后评价 文本挖掘 R语言 LDA topic modeling post-environmental impact review text mining R language
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献148

  • 1陈国权.学习型组织的组织结构特征与案例分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(4):56-67. 被引量:44
  • 2王燕.一种改进的K-means聚类算法[J].计算机应用与软件,2004,21(10):122-123. 被引量:9
  • 3曹庆奎,任向阳,刘琛,刘历波.基于粗集-未确知测度模型的企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(4):67-72. 被引量:58
  • 4蔡宁,吴结兵,殷鸣.产业集群复杂网络的结构与功能分析[J].经济地理,2006,26(3):378-382. 被引量:117
  • 5Russo, J. E. and Schoemaker, P. J. H.. Decision traps: the ten barriers to brilliant decision-, making and how to overcome them[M]. New York: Simon Schuster Inc, 1989.
  • 6Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984:21.
  • 7Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective[M]. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, 1978.
  • 8Argyris, C. and Schon, D. A. Organizational Learning Ⅱ: Theory, method and practice[M]. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, 1996.
  • 9Herriott S, R.. Levinthal, D. and March, J.G.. Learning from Experience in Organizations[J]. American Economic Review, 1985,75 :298- 302.
  • 10Huber G. P.Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures[J].Organization Science, 1991,2:88-115.

共引文献330

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部