文学文本与历史的商讨——从《朵帕蒂》看斯皮瓦克与新历史主义

Negotiations between Literary Texts and History:Inquiry into Spivak’s Relation to New Historicism through “Draupadi”

斯皮瓦克给自己贴上"解构主义"、"女性主义"、"马克思主义"及"后殖民主义"等标签,然而,对于新历史主义她却持保留意见,认为"历史"到了新历史主义那里成了一种修辞误用。但是,在威瑟编著的《新历史主义读本》中收录了一篇斯皮瓦克的访谈录,在编者循循善诱、层层逼问之下,斯皮瓦克躲闪不及,最后承认自己无意中与新历史主义牵扯上了关系。本文试图从新历史主义批评和斯皮瓦克对文学文本与历史之间的商讨这一角度来切入,具体探究两者之间存在的诸多和而不同之处。

Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak labels herself as a "deconstructionist","feminist","Marxist " and"post-colonist critic",yet she seems rather reluctant to be related to New Historicism,whose concept of history for her is a kind of catachresis. However,in New Historicism Reader edited by H. Veeser,an interview with Spivak is also included,in which Veeser focuses on how Spivak can be connected to New Historicism. This article attempts to explore how Spivak specifically relates to New Historicism from the perspective of the negotiations between literary texts and history,so as to draw out their similarities and differences.