无用之“用”和不空之“空”——巴瓦自宅空间复杂性探源

The Useless Use and the Void Forms:on the Spacial Complexity of Geoffery Bawa’s 33 Lane House

借分析巴瓦自宅细致的“使用功能一感官体验”分级处理,结合其他案例,重新思考“形式”和“功能”、“被服务空间”和“服务空间”的关系,以及老子“有之以为利,无之以为用”的深层含义,指出具有精神伦理作用的“空间”也是一种“功能”,功能的终点是感官,包括被服务空间的感官细分|和服务空间的审美化。建筑师的作用,是对不同层次的功能作出差异化的反应,令建筑表现为虚与实的多层转换。

Based on the analysis of Bawa's detailed grading treatment of"function-experience",together with other examples,this paper rethinks the relationship between"form"and"function","served space"and"service space",as well as the deep meaning of Laozi's"being for benefit,not being for use",and points out that"space"with spiritual-ethical function is also a"function",and the summit of function is the sensitivities,including the hierarchy of the service space,and the aesthetic of the service space.The architect's role is to make a differential response to the functions of different levels,so that the architecture can be shown as a multi-layer transformation of the entity and the void.