摘要
本研究基于125家高校智库数据,运用层级分析法对智库资源投入效果进行测量,并进一步分析治理结构的调节作用。实证结果表明:部分"211工程"高校智库和处于成熟期的高校智库治理结构缺损;"211工程"高校智库并非天然拥有更多的资源,而完善的治理结构才有助于其吸引更多的资源;对于内部治理结构缺损的智库,资源投入对智库产出的影响不显著。研究结论证明了高校智库的成长不仅依赖于资源投入,更依赖于完善的治理结构和资源管理能力。因此,加强中国特色新型高校智库建设,既要保证资源投入,又要通过政策引导完善治理结构,提高资源利用效率,进而提升竞争力和影响力。
Based on the data of 125 university think tanks in China, the study uses the hierarchical analysis method to measure the investment effect of think tank resources, and further analyzes the regulation role of governance structure. The empirical results show that think tanks in some "Project 211" universities and some mature universities have governance structural defects;"Project 211" university think tanks do not naturally have more resources, and a sound governance structure will help them attract more resources;for the think tank with internal governance structural defects, the impact of resource input on the output of think tanks is not significant. The research conclusions prove that the growth of university think tanks depends not only on resource input, but also on the improved governance structure and resource management capabilities. Therefore, to strengthen the development of new think tanks with Chinese characteristics, it is necessary to ensure the resource input, and to guide university think tanks to improve the governance structure through policies, so as to improve the efficiency of resources, and thus enhance competitiveness and influences.
作者
李韵婷
张日新
LI Yunting;ZHANG Rixin(Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,South China Agricultural University;College of Economics&Management,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou 510642,China)
出处
《高校教育管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期98-105,共8页
Journal of Higher Education Management
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(16YJA880064)
广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划2017年度学科共建项目(GD17XJY15)
2017年广东高校青年创新人才类项目(2017WQNCX011)
2017年广东高校基础研究重大项目及应用研究重大项目(2017WZDXM001)
2019年度华南农业大学青年教职工关切问题研究项目(QG1902)
关键词
中国特色新型智库
高校智库
资源投入
智库产出
治理结构
new think tanks with Chinese characteristics
university think tanks
resource input
think tank output
governance structure