顾叔龙与陈献章交游、关系考

The Study On Gu Shulong and His Intercourse with Chen Xianzhang

在传统的白沙门人辑录、考证方面,清代阮榕龄建树甚大。明代黄淳在建构白沙学派时,将顾勉斋纳入白沙门人之列。阮榕龄接纳了这一观点,并认为黄淳所言顾勉斋实即顾勉庵(即顾叔龙)。但后来阮榕龄又将顾勉庵归于白沙友人之列,这就为后世遗留了一个百年矛盾。综合正反两方面的证据来看,顾勉斋为白沙友人而非门人。顾叔龙与陈白沙的关系,在白沙学中是一个不起眼的小问题,但在白沙门人研究中却是一个不可回避的基本问题。该问题的解决不仅有助于澄清白沙门人的范围,而且也会增进人们对白沙交游情况的理解。

Ruan Rongling made a great contribution to the traditional collection and textual research of Paisha’s disciples in Qing Dynasty.During the construction of Paisha school,Huang Chun who lived in Ming Dynasty,included Gu Mianzhai in the list of Paisha disciples.Ruan Rongling accepted this viewpoint,and also suspected that Gu Mianzhai,as Huang Chun said,was actually Gu Mian’an(Gu Shulong).However,he later attributed Gu Mian'an to Baisha’s friend.Then,he left behind a century old problem of contradiction for later generations.Based on the positive and negative evidence,Gu Mianzhai was a friend of Paisha rather than a disciple.The relationship between Gu Shulong and Chen Paisha was a small problem in Paisha studies;but in the study of Paisha disciples,this was an unavoidable basic problem.The solution of this problem would not only help to clarify the scope of Paisha disciples,but also enhance people's understanding of Paisha's communication.