期刊文献+

延续性管理模式在慢性心力衰竭患者中的应用 被引量:7

Application of continuity management model in chronic heart failure patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨延续性管理模式在慢性心力衰竭患者中的应用效果。方法选择首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院2016年1月~2018年1月连续性收集的慢性心力衰竭患者115例进行研究,按入院顺序将患者分为对照组45例和观察组70例。比较两组患者生活质量评分、社会支持评分、焦虑评分、抑郁评分情况,6 min步行试验(6 MWT)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、血浆氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-pro BNP)情况,随访1年,记录再次入院率、死亡率情况。结果两组患者管理模式实施前生活质量评分、社会支持评分、焦虑评分、抑郁评分、6 MWT、LVEF、NT-pro BNP比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),管理模式实施后,对照组和观察组生活质量评分、社会支持评分、6 MWT、LVEF均高于本组管理模式实施前,焦虑评分、抑郁评分、NT-pro BNP均低于本组管理模式实施前,且观察组患者生活质量评分、社会支持评分、6 MWT、LVEF均高于对照组,焦虑评分、抑郁评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),两组患者管理模式实施后NT-pro BNP比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者1年内再次入院率、死亡率均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论延续性管理模式在慢性心力衰竭患者中应用,明显提高了患者的生活质量、社会支持,改善了不良心理情绪,提高了运动耐量,降低了复发和死亡率。 Objective To explore the effect of continuous management mode in patients with chronic heart failure.Method A total of 115 patients with chronic heart failure from Beijing Shijitan Hospital,Capital Medical University from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected for the study,the patients were divided into control group 45 cases and observation group 70 cases according to the order of admission.The quality of life score,social support score,anxiety score and depression score of the two groups were investigated,the 6 min walking test(6 MWT),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)and plasma amino-terminal brain natriuretic peptide precursor(NT-pro BNP)were compared.Follow-up was conducted for 1 year to record readmission rate and mortality.Results There were no statistically significant differences in quality of life score,social support score,anxiety score,depression score,6 MWT,LVEF,NT-pro BNP before the implementation of management mode between the two groups of patients(all P>0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the management model,after the implementation of the quality of life scores in the control group and observation group,social support score,6 MWT,LVEF were higher than before the implementation of this management mode,anxiety score,depression score,NT-pro BNP were lower than before the implementation of this management mode,and the observation group of patients quality of life scale,social support score,6 MWT,LVEF were higher than the control group,the anxiety score,depression score were lower than the control group,the difference had statistical significance(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in NT-pro BNP between the two groups after the implementation of the management mode(P>0.05).The readmission rate and mortality rate in the observation group within 1 year were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).Conclusion The application of continuous management mode in patients with chronic heart failure significantly improved the quality of life,social support,improved the poor psychological mood,improved the exercise tolerance,and reduced the recurrence and mortality.
作者 路阳 陈策 姚娜 徐东妮 LU Yang;CHEN Ce;YAO Na;XU Dongni(Ward 2,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,Beijing Shijitan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100038,China)
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2019年第34期177-180,共4页 China Medical Herald
关键词 延续性管理模式 慢性心力衰竭 生活质量 社会支持 Continuity management model Chronic heart failure Life quality Social support
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献181

  • 1侯云英,范秀珍.慢性心力衰竭患者的生活质量及其干预研究进展[J].解放军护理杂志,2005,22(9):54-56. 被引量:19
  • 2席淑华,赵继军,赵建华,张佩雯.成功大学附属医院出院准备服务概况与启示[J].中华护理杂志,2007,42(4):341-342. 被引量:105
  • 3Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 1994, 74: 1240-1244.
  • 4Rector T, Kubo S, Cohn J. Patient's self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part2: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 1987, 3: 198-209.
  • 5Riegel B, Moser DK, Glaser D, et al. The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire: sensitivity to differences and responsiveness to intervention intensity in a clinical population.Nurs Res, 2002, 51: 209-218.
  • 6Middel B, Bouma J, de Jongste M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire(MLHF-Q). Clin Rehabil, 2001, 15: 489-500.
  • 7Ni H, Toy W, Burgess D, et al. Comparative responsiveness of Short-Form 12 and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail, 2000, 6: 83-91.
  • 8Sneed NV, Paul S, Michel Y, et al. Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure.Heart Lung, 200l, 30:332-340.
  • 9Smith RF, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. Functional capacity in heart failure : Comparison of methods for assessment and their relation to other indexes of heart failure. Circulation, 1993, 87(suppl 6): Ⅵ88-Ⅵ93.
  • 10Gorkin L, Norvell NK, Rosen RC, et al. Assessment of quality of life as observed from the baseline data of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trial quality-of life substudy.Am J Cardiol, 1993, 71: 1069-1073.

共引文献544

同被引文献83

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部