期刊文献+

经鼻双水平正压通气治疗极低出生体重早产儿呼吸暂停综合征的临床疗效观察 被引量:8

Observation of the curative effect of bi-level positive airway pressure in the treatment of apnea of very low birth weight premature infants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经鼻双水平正压通气(BiPAP)在极低出生体重早产儿呼吸暂停综合征中的临床应用效果。方法:选取极低出生体重早产儿呼吸暂停综合征患儿62例作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,各组31例。两组均给予常规治疗,在此基础上观察组给予经鼻双水平正压通气模式(BiPAP)治疗,对照组给予经鼻持续正压通气模式(CPAP)治疗。观察两组临床效果,比较治疗前、治疗第1天、第3天血氧分压、血二氧化碳分压、pH值。结果:观察组治疗总有效率93.5%(29/31),高于对照组74.2%(23/31),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗第1天、治疗第3天血氧分压、血二氧化碳分压、pH值改善情况比对照组好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组与对照组发生气漏综合征(3.2%比3.2%)、支气管肺发育不良(3.2%比6.5%)、脑室内出血(IVH)(3.2%比3.2%),两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经鼻双水平正压通气治疗极低出生体重早产儿呼吸暂停综合征患儿效果显著,具有较高临床应用价值。 Objective To explore the clinical application effect of bi-level positive airway pressure(BiPAP)in the treatment of apnea of very low birth weight premature infants.Method 62 cases of very low birth weight premature infants with apnea syndrome were selected as the study subjects.They were randomly divided into observation group and control group,31 cases in each group.Two group was given normal treatment.On this basis,the observation group was treated with BiPAP,while the control group was treated with CPAP.Two groups of clinical therapeutic effect was observed,and compared before treatment,1 d,3 d treatment the blood oxygen partial pressure,blood Carbon dioxide partial pressure and pH value.Results The effective rate of the observation group(93.5%,29/31)was higher than that of the control group(74.2%,23/31),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The blood oxygen partial pressure,blood partial pressure and pH value of the observation group were better than those of the control group at 1 d and 3 d(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group in the occurrence of air leak syndrome(3.2%vs 3.2%),bronchopulmonary dysplasia(3.2%vs 6.5%)and intraventricular hemorrhage(3.3%vs 3.3%)(P>0.05).Conclusion Bi-level positive airway pressure in the treatment of very low birth weight premature apnea syndrome effect is remarkable,has high clinical value.
作者 邵俞 叶科军 SHAO Yu;YE Ke-jun(Department of pediatrics,The People′s Hospital of Yuyao City,Zhejiang Province,Yuyao 315400,China)
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2020年第1期47-50,共4页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 呼吸暂停综合征 极低出生体重 经鼻双水平正压通气模式 经鼻持续正压通气模式 早产儿 Apnea syndrome Very low birth weight The bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation mode The nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation mode Premature babies
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
  • 2郑军,李月琴,王晓鹏.新生儿诊疗手册.天津科技翻译出版公司.2011.335-339.
  • 3Ancora G,Maranella E, Grandi S, et al. Role of bilevel positive airway pressure in the management of preterm newborn who have received surfactant. Acta Paediatr, 2010, 99 : 1807-1811.
  • 4Lista G,Castoldi F, Fontana P, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2010, 95 :185-89.
  • 5Victor S, Extubate Trial Croup. EXTUBATE: a randomised controlled trial of nasal biphasic positive airway pressure vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure following extubation in infants less than 30 weeks" gestation: study protocol for a randomised contrelled trial. Trials.2011. 12:257.
  • 6Zhao J, Gonzalez F, Mu D. Apnea of prematurity: from cause to treatment. Eur J Pediatr,2011, 170 : 1097-1105.
  • 7徐书珍,初建芳,于永辉.儿科疾病症状鉴别诊断学.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2001.538-541.
  • 8Migliori C, Motta M, Angeli A, et al, Nasal hilevel vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol,2005, 40:426-430.
  • 9DiBlasi RM. Neonatal noninvasive ventilation techniques: do we really need to intubate? Respir Care,2011,56 : 1273-1294.
  • 10赵婧,母得志.早产儿呼吸暂停诊治进展[J].临床儿科杂志,2012,30(3):291-294. 被引量:58

共引文献41

同被引文献74

引证文献8

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部