摘要
柯亨认为,马克思对资本主义社会的剥削的批判是基于自由意志主义的自我所有原则的基础上,因此,马克思对资本主义社会不平等的批判也就会失去其效力。柯亨从学院派的立场出发对马克思的所有权观作了错误的理解,这是柯亨采用的抽象的哲学反思研究规范性本质的"非历史"学科与马克思的历史唯物主义两种不同哲学基础的理论冲突。事实上,马克思对资本主义社会的批判是建立在对资本主义社会生产方式和生产关系的考察上,以揭露资本主义价值原则的内在矛盾并进而在历史唯物主义的基础上论断了资本主义向社会主义过渡的客观规律。
Cohen believes that Marx’s criticism of the exploitation of capitalist society is based on the principle of self-ownership of libertarianism,so Marx’s criticism of the inequality of capitalist society will lose its effectiveness.Cohen misunderstood Marx’ s concept of ownership from the standpoint of academics, which is the theoretical conflict between the two philosophical bases of" non-historical" discipline and Marx’ s historical materialism, which Cohen used to study the normative nature of abstract philosophical reflection.In fact, Marx’ s criticism of capitalist society is based on the investigation of the mode of production and the relations of production in capitalist society,in order to expose the inherent contradiction of capitalist value principle,and then,on the basis of historical materialism, to deduce the objective law of the transition from capitalism to socialism.
出处
《理论界》
2019年第11期14-21,共8页
Theory Horizon
关键词
剥削
自我所有原则
学院派
历史唯物主义
exploitation
principle of self-ownership
academic school
historical materialism