论史学史视域下的史学评论

On Historiography Commentary from the Perspective of History of Historiography

在史学界,多年以来讨论的"史学评论"或称"史学批评"问题,所涉两个词语含义相同,但选用不一。实际上稍作辨析,以"史学评论"为佳。史学评论在学科上何所归属?学界流行两种见解,一是主张自成一门学科,二是属于史学理论,二说皆不允当。史学评论是史学史学科的一项内容,是史学史评议以往史学现象向当代的延伸。史学史视域下的史学评论要将评论对象置于历来史学发展的进程中作定性和定位分析,眼光是长时段的、广视野的,具备深入的学术性。史学评论的价值标准,只有学术标准一项,其他因素都应该深化为学术性评议。史学史视域下的史学评论,需要克服难点,承当其推动历史学健康发展的学术使命。

In the field of historiography,the issue of"historiography commentary"or known as"historiography criticism"has been discussed for many years.The two involved words have the same meaning but are different in choice.As a matter of fact,the"historiography commentary"is the best with a brief analysis.What does historiography commentary belong to in the discipline?There are two popular opinions in academic circles,One is that it is a discipline,the second is it belongs to the theory of historiography,neither is proper.Historiography commentary is one of the contents of history of historiography.It is the extension of comment on historiography phenomenon from the past to the present.historiography commentary from the perspective of History of historiography should put the object of comment in the process of historiography development for qualitative and positioning analysis.It has long-term,broad vision,and with in-depth academic.There is only one academic standard about the value standard of historiography commentary.Other factors should be deepened into academic evaluation.historiography commentary from the perspective of History of historiography needs to overcome the difficulties and undertake its academic mission of promoting the healthy development of history.