期刊文献+

基于Ypc_EMM指数和Ypc_EMM’指数的学者评价指标研究

Scholar Evaluation Research Based on Ypc_EMM Index and Ypc_EMM’ Index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]旨在为学者影响力评价提供参考。[方法/过程]阐述Ypc_EM类指数和EMM类指数的原理,利用现有相对成熟的理论及公式进行整合,构造出新的Ypc_EMM指数和Ypc_EMM′指数,并以兰州大学化学化工学院SCI引用TOP70研究人员为研究对象,对Ypc_EMM指数和Ypc_EMM′指数的区分性、稳定性和相关性进行实证分析。[结果/结论]Ypc_EMM指数和Ypc_EMM′指数的区分能力强于Ypc_EM指数和Ypc_EM′指数,且名次变化明显;Ypc_EM指数、Ypc_EM′指数、Ypc_EMM指数、Ypc_EMM′指数四者与h指数都具有较强的相关性,且改进后的Ypc_EMM指数和Ypc_EMM′指数对学者影响力评价更加全面、客观。 [Purpose/significance]The paper is to provide references for the evaluation of scholars’influence.[Method/process]The paper expounds the principles of Ypc_EM class index and EMM class index constructs new Ypc_EMM index and Ypc_EMM′index by integrating the existing and relatively mature theories and formulas and takes Top70 researchers from the college of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering of Lanzhou University and included in SCI as study objects to do empirical analysis on the differentiation stability and correlation of Ypc_EMM index and Ypc_EMM′index.[Result/conclusion]Ypc_EMM index and Ypc_EMM′index are more distinguishable than Ypc_EM index and Ypc_EM′index and their rankings change apparently.The four indexes including Ypc_EM index Ypc_EM′index Ypc_EMM index and Ypc_EMM′index have strong correlation with h-index and the improved Ypc_EMM index and Ypc_EMM′index are more comprehensive and objective in the evaluation of scholars’influence.
作者 刘雪梅 陈宏东 王海花 Liu Xuemei;Chen Hongdong;Wang Haihua(Lanzhou University Library,Lanzhou Gansu 730000)
机构地区 兰州大学图书馆
出处 《情报探索》 2020年第1期23-30,共8页 Information Research
关键词 H指数 Ypc_EM指数 Ypc_EM′指数 Ypc_EMM指数 Ypc_EMM′指数 学者评价 h-index Ypc_EM index Ypc_EM′index Ypc_EMM index Ypc_EMM′index scholar evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献70

  • 1金碧辉.科学家为自己设计了一项评价指标:h指数[J].科学观察,2006,1(1):8-9. 被引量:71
  • 2金碧辉,Rousseau Ronald.R指数、AR指数:h指数功能扩展的补充指标[J].科学观察,2007,2(3):1-8. 被引量:179
  • 3Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual' s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102(46 ) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 4Egghe L. An improvement of the h-index : g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2006,2(1) :8 -9.
  • 5Molinari JF, Molinari A. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 2008, 75( 1 ) : 163 - 174.
  • 6Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. hg-index : a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g-indices. Scientometrics, 2010,82 ( 2 ) : 391 - 400.
  • 7Prathap G. Is there a place for a mock h-index. Scientometrics, 2009,84(1 ) :153 - 165.
  • 8Zhang CT. The e-index, complementing the h-Index for exces scitations. PLoS ONE, 2009,4(5) :e5429.
  • 9Barendse W. The strike rate index : a new index for journal quality based on journals size and the h-index of citations. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2007, g : 3.
  • 10Glanzel W. On the opportunities and limitations of the h index, Science Focus, 2006, 1 ( 1 ) : 10 - 11.

共引文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部