期刊文献+

支付方式对冲动消费的影响:思维方式为中介 被引量:2

Influence of Payment Method on Impulse Consumption:The Mediating Effect of Thinking Mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于决策双系统理论,以59名18~22岁大学生群体为被试,采用理性与经验SSTS量表、简短情绪反应量表以及自制的支付方式体验性量表,通过实验方法考察不同的支付方式是否会通过思维方式的中介作用影响消费者的冲动消费。结果表明:1、不同支付方式的消费总额存在显著差异,使用移动支付的被试花费的金额显著大于使用现金支付的被试;2、不同支付方式会产生不同的思维方式,使用移动支付的被试更倾向于采用启发式思维,而使用现金支付的被试更倾向于采用分析式思维。因此,思维方式在支付方式对于消费者冲动消费的影响中起到部分中介作用。 This study is based on the theory of decision-making dual system.59 students at the age of 18 to 22 are tested.By using the rational and empirical scale,brief emotional response questionnaire and self-made payment method experience scale,it investigates whether different payment methods affect consumers impulse consumption through the mediating effect of thinking mode.The results of the study show that:1、there are significant differences in the total consumption of different payment methods:the amount spent by the subjects using mobile payment is significantly greater than that of the subjects using cash payment.2、different payment methods generate different thinking patterns:subjects using mobile payment are more inclined to adopt heuristic thinking,while those using cash payment are more inclined to adopt analytical thinking.Therefore,thinking mode plays partial mediating effect in the influence of payment mode on consumers impulse consumption.
作者 许铭嘉 陆晓倩 XU Mingjia;LU Xiaoqian(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;School of Business Management,Jimei University,Xiamen Fujian 361021,China)
出处 《莆田学院学报》 2019年第6期33-38,共6页 Journal of putian University
基金 福建省社科联基金资助项目(FJ2019B104) 福建省科技厅(软科学)资助项目(2018R0070)
关键词 冲动消费 支付方式 思维方式 中介作用 决策双系统理论 impulse consumption payment mode thinking mode mediating effect theory of decision-making dual system
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献101

  • 1刘璐,赵玉芳,黄雨晴,王一竹,朱勇.提升内隐自尊减少社会排斥诱发的攻击性[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,37(8):135-138. 被引量:5
  • 2梁宁建,吴明证,邱扶东,曹小燕.互联网成瘾者内隐网络态度及其干预研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):796-798. 被引量:29
  • 3李晓明,傅小兰.决策中的延迟选择行为[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):127-129. 被引量:13
  • 4孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:145
  • 5Sloman S A.The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,1996,119:3-22
  • 6Evans J S B T.Logical and human reasoning:An assessment of the deductive paradigm.Psychological Bulletin,2002,128:978-996
  • 7Evans J S B T.In two minds:dual-process account of reasoning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003,7:454-459.
  • 8Stanovich K E,West R F.Individual differences in reasoning:Implications for the rationality debate.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,2000,23:645-726
  • 9Kahneman D,Frederick S.Representativeness revisited:Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.In:Gilovich T,Griffin D,Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.49-81
  • 10Sloman S A.Two systems of reasoning.In:Gilovich T,Griffin D,Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.379-396

共引文献203

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部