单议题修正主义国家的确定逻辑

The Logic of Confirming Revisionist State over Single Issue

目前,学界尚无较有说服力的修正主义国家确定标准。绝大多数文献忽视了现状的本质及其分别与国家和权力之间的关系;同时,脱离具体议题讨论修正主义国家也缺乏意义,易受判断主体倾向性价值的影响。在不考虑国内因素的情况下,本文尝试将修正主义视为一个变量和分析框架,并认为其具有态度与行为两个维度,国际权威标准是其测量工具,符合该标准则为合法,反之非法。由此,修正主义在性质上可以分为四个类型。当且仅当一国对单议题现状的态度与行为修正主义同时为非法时,则该国就是单议题修正主义国家。除了补充相关理论之外,这一标准可能有助于更好地理解现实中的国际合作与竞争。

There has been no convincing criteria to define revisionist state today.Most of the literature in this term has ignored the nature of the status quo and its connections with the state and power.Meanwhile,discussing revisionist countries without referring to specific issues is also meaningless,making it easy to be affected by subjective judgements.In view of this point,this paper attempts to put forward a new theoretical framework to analyze the conditions for any nation-state to become a revisionist over particular issues and to further verify its consistency with different cases.Revisionism is often treated as an exogenous"value-negation"which creates controversies.In this paper,revisionism is regarded as a variable and an analytical framework.Meanwhile,it is considered to have two dimensions,including attitude and behavior.The international authoritative standard is operated as measuring tool for revisionism.The revisionism is legal if it does meet the standard,otherwise illegal.Under such condition,property of revisionism can be classified into four types.A country is considered as a revisionist state over single-issue only if its attitude towards the status quo of a single issue is simultaneously illegal with behavioral revisionism.In addition to supplementing the relevant theories,this conclusion may contribute to a better understanding of international cooperation and competition in reality.