期刊文献+

不同分娩方式对瘢痕子宫再妊娠结局的影响 被引量:4

The Effect of Different Delivery Modes on the Outcome of Repregnancy of Scarred Uterus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同分娩方式对瘢痕子宫再妊娠结局的影响。方法选取2014年1月-2018年12月在我院进行住院分娩的100例剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再妊娠孕妇作为研究对象,按照分娩方式不同将100例孕妇分为剖宫产组(60例)和阴道试产组(40例);对两组产后24 h出血量、新生儿Apgar评分、住院时间及产妇不良事件发生情况进行对比分析。结果剖宫产组所有孕妇均手术成功;阴道试产组40例孕妇试产成功32例,8例中转剖腹产;剖宫产组产后24 h出血量显著多于阴道试产组(P<0.05),住院时间显著长于阴道试产组(P<0.05);两组新生儿Apgar评分比较差异不显著(P>0.05);剖宫产组产妇不良事件发生率显著高于阴道试产组(P<0.05)。结论无剖宫产指征的瘢痕子宫再妊娠孕妇引导试产效果良好,因此对于有阴道分娩条件且无剖宫产指征的瘢痕子宫再妊娠孕妇分娩时应尝试进行阴道分娩。 Objective To explore the effect of different delivery methods on the outcome of re-pregnancy of scarred uterus.Methods 100 pregnant women with scar uterus pregnancy after cesarean section who delivered in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were selected as the research objects.According to the different delivery modes,100 pregnant women were divided into cesarean section group(60 cases)and vaginal trial group(40 cases).The amount of postpartum hemorrhage,neonatal Apgar score and hospitalization were compared between the two groups.Time and maternal adverse events were compared and analyzed.Results All the pregnant women in the cesarean section group were operated successfully;In the vaginal trial group,32 cases were successfully delivered and 8 cases were transferred to cesarean section;In the cesarean section group,the amount of bleeding at 24 hours after delivery was significantly higher than that in the vaginal trial group(P<0.05),and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer than that in the vaginal trial group(P<0.05);There was no significant difference in Apgar score between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of adverse events in cesarean section group was significantly higher than that in vaginal trial group(P<0.05).Conclusion Pregnant women with scarred uterus without cesarean section indication have good effect in guiding trial delivery.Therefore,vaginal delivery should be attempted for pregnant women with scarred uterus with vaginal delivery conditions and without cesarean section indication.
作者 邵燕 SHAO Yan(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,The Sixth People's Hospital of Tongzhou District,Nantong Jiangsu 226351,China)
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2019年第24期67-70,共4页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 瘢痕子宫 再妊娠 分娩方式 剖宫产 阴道分娩 APGAR评分 scarred uterus re-pregnancy mode of delivery cesarean section vaginal delivery Apgar score
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献87

  • 1高淑云,荆瑞巍,金莲梅,徐昌.北京市某医院415例产妇分娩方式及影响因素的调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2004,25(9):799-801. 被引量:11
  • 2龙丽霞,栾桦,柳肃芬.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕处妊娠五例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(10):697-698. 被引量:36
  • 3杨峰,巩苏,张昆,洪兰英.剖宫产后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择[J].实用医技杂志,2007,14(12):1651-1652. 被引量:48
  • 4韦浪花,庄亚玲,黄丽丽.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕处早期妊娠70例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(7):487-488. 被引量:84
  • 5DECLERCQ E, YOUNG R, CABRAL H, et al. Is a risingcesarean delivery rate inevitable- Trends in industrializedcountries, 1987 to 2007[J]. Birth, 2011, 38(2): 99-104.
  • 6NEU J,RUSHING J. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery : longterminfant outcomes and the hygiene hypothesis[J]. ClinPerinatol, 2011, 38(2): 321-331.
  • 7TIMOR-TRITSCH IE,MONTEAGUDO A. Unforeseenconsequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries :early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. Areview[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(1): 14-29.
  • 8彭淑霞, 胡龙妹, 肖秋萍等. 瘢痕子宫5113 例足月妊娠分娩结局临床分析[C].// 中华医学会第十次全国妇产科学术会议论文集.2012:180-180.
  • 9BEVAN AK,DUQUE S,FOUST KD,et al. Systemic gene delivery in large species for targeting spinal cord,brain,andperipheral tissues for pediatric disorders[J]. Mol Ther, 2011,19(11): 1971-1980.
  • 10RAUTAVA S,LUOTO R,SALMINEN S,et al. Microbialcontact during pregnancy,intestinal colonization and humandisease[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012, 9(10): 565-576.

共引文献174

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部