期刊文献+

群体认同与社会评价对消极群体情绪的影响 被引量:8

Effects of Group Identification and Social Evaluation on Negative Groups’ Emotion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以网络中有关大学生的负面新闻报道为研究材料,考察了面对群体负面信息,群体认同与社会评价对群体情绪的影响。结果发现:不同社会评价只影响低群体认同个体的群体内疚强度。具体而言,正性能力评价和负性道德评价对低群体认同个体的群体内疚具有促进作用;高群体认同个体的群体愤怒始终高于低群体认同个体。结果表明,高群体认同个体的群体内疚不易受社会评价的影响;而低群体认同个体在受到负性道德评价和正性能力评价时,群体内疚体验更强烈;群体愤怒只受群体认同强度影响。 This study used the negative news reports on college students collected from the Internet to investigate the influence of group identification and social evaluation on group-based emotions. The results showed that: different social evaluations only affect the group-based guilt intensity of individuals with low group identity, and, specifically, positive ability evaluation and negative moral evaluation can promote the group-based guilt of individuals with low group identity;and individuals with high group identity are easier to get enraged than those with low group identity. These suggested that group-based guilt of individuals with high group identity is not easily affected by social evaluation whereas group-based guilt experience is stronger when individuals with low group identity received negative moral evaluation and positive ability evaluation, and that group-based anger is only affected by the intensity of group identity.
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2020年第1期113-118,共6页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
关键词 群体内疚 群体愤怒 道德评价 能力评价 group guilt group-based anger moral evaluation ability evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献62

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7704
  • 2温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3155
  • 3温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰.有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):448-452. 被引量:743
  • 4王晓东.创新弱势群体利益诉求机制 预防和化解群体性事件[J].中共太原市委党校学报,2006(3):18-21. 被引量:26
  • 5王沛,刘峰.社会认同理论视野下的社会认同威胁[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):822-827. 被引量:71
  • 6Schlosser, A.E.. Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2005, 32(2).
  • 7Thompson,M.M.,M.P. Zanna,and D.W. Griffin. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence [A]//Petty,Richard E. and Krosnick, Jon A. (Ed).Attitude strength :Antecedents and con- sequences.Ohio State University series on attitudes and persuasion, Vol. 4,1995.
  • 8Lowrey, T.M. and C. Otnes. A theoretical and interpretive ex- ploration of ambivalence within the context of the Wedding[C].Pa- per presented at the Association for Consumer Research Confer- ence,Boston, 1994.
  • 9LEACH C W, SNIDER N, IYER A. Poisoning the Consciences of the Fortunate: The Experience of Rel- ative Advantage and Support for Social Equality [M]//WALKER I, SMITH H J. Relative Depriva- tion: Specification, Development, and Integration. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • 10SCHMITT M T, BRANSCOMBE N R, BREHM J W. Gender Inequality and the Intensity of Men's Col- lective Guilt[M]//BRANSCOMBE N R,DOOSJE B. Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2004 : 75 - 93.

共引文献59

同被引文献79

引证文献8

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部