摘要
目的:评价大黄素-8-O-β-D-葡萄糖苷(EG)的体内外遗传毒性,并比较体外细胞试验及大鼠体内实验评价结果的差异。方法:采用体外二维(2D)、三维(3D)细胞培养法分别构建2D、3D HepaRG细胞模型,造模成功后,分别将2D、3D HepaRG细胞分为空白对照组[0.5%二甲基亚砜(DMSO)]、丝裂霉素C组(阳性对照,0.1μg/mL)和EG低、中、高剂量组(10、50、200μg/mL),然后检测各组HepaRG细胞的微核形成率和尾DNA百分含量。将SD大鼠分为空白对照组(0.5%羧甲基纤维素钠)、甲磺酸乙酯组(阳性对照,200 mg/kg)和EG低、中、高剂量组(100、300、1 000 mg/kg),每组6只,连续灌胃给药15 d,每天1次;15 d后检测各组大鼠骨髓嗜多染红细胞、肝细胞的微核形成率及外周血淋巴细胞、肝细胞的尾DNA百分含量、尾距。结果:在体外2D HepaRG细胞模型中,与空白对照组比较,丝裂霉素C组HepaRG细胞的微核形成率和尾DNA百分含量均显著升高(P<0.01),EG各剂量组HepaRG细胞的微核形成率和尾DNA百分含量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在3D HepaRG细胞模型中,与空白对照组比较,丝裂霉素C组HepaRG细胞的微核形成率和尾DNA百分含量均显著升高(P<0.01或P<0.001),EG高剂量组HepaRG细胞的尾DNA百分含量显著升高(P<0.01)。在大鼠体内实验中,与空白对照组比较,甲磺酸乙酯组大鼠骨髓嗜多染红细胞、肝细胞的微核形成率和外周血淋巴细胞、肝细胞的尾DNA百分含量、尾距均显著升高(P<0.01),EG高剂量组大鼠外周血淋巴细胞尾DNA百分含量显著升高(P<0.01),EG各剂量组大鼠骨髓嗜多染红细胞、肝细胞的微核形成率和肝细胞尾DNA百分含量、尾距差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但随剂量增加有升高趋势。结论:本研究结果提示在2D细胞模型中,EG未导致染色体断裂及DNA损伤,但3D细胞模型长期给药和体内重复给药结果均显示EG存在一定DNA损伤风险,故3D HepaRG细胞模型的评价结果更接近大鼠体内实验结果。
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of emodin-8-O-β-D-glucoside(EG),and to compare the difference of in vitro cell test and in vivo test of rats. METHODS:2D and 3D hepatocyte models were established by in vitro two-dimensional(2D) and three-dimensional(3D) cell culture. After modeling,2D and 3D hepatocyte were divided into blank control group(0.5% DMSO),mitomycin C group(positive control,0.1 μg/m L),EG low-dose,medium-dose and high-dose groups(10,50,200 μg/m L),respectively. The micronucleus ratio and tail DNA% of Hepa RG cells were detected. SD rats were divided into blank control group(0.5% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose),ethyl methanesulfonate group(positive control,200 mg/kg),EG low-dose,medium-dose and high-dose groups(100,300,1 000 mg/kg),with 6 rats in each group. They were given medicine intragastrically for consecutive 15 d, once a day. 15 days later, the micronucleus formation rate of bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes and hepatocytes,the tail DNA% and tail distance of peripheral blood lymphocytes and hepatocytes were measured. RESULTS:In the in vitro 2D Hepa RG hepatocyte model,compared with blank control group,the micronucleus formation rate and tail DNA% of Hepa RG cell were increased significantly in mitomycin C group(P<0.01). There was no statistical significance in micronucleus formation rate and tail DNA% of Hepa RG cell among EG groups(P>0.05). In 3D Hepa RG cell model, compared with blank control group,micronucleus formation rate and tail DNA% of Hepa RG cell were increased significantly in mitomycin C group(P<0.01 or P<0.001), while tail DNA% of Hepa RG cell was increased significantly in EG high-dose group(P<0.01). In the in vivo test,compared with blank control group,the micronucleus formation rate of bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes and hepatocytes,the tail DNA% and tail distance of peripheral blood lymphocytes and hepatocytes were all increased significantly in ethyl methanesulfonate group(P<0.01). Tail DNA% of peripheral blood lymphocytes was increased significantly in EG high-dose group(P<0.01). There was no statistical significance in the micronucleus formation rate of bone marrow polychromatic erythrocytes and hepatocytes,the tail DNA% and tail distance of hepatocytes among EG groups(P>0.05);with the increase of dose,there was an increasing trend. CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study suggest that in 2D cell model, EG not lead to chromosome breakage and DNA damage, but the long-term administration and repeated administration in vivo of 3D cell model show that EG has a certain risk of DNA damage,so the evaluation results of 3D Hepa RG cell model are more similar to those of rats in vivo.
作者
文海若
颜玉静
宋捷
鄂蕊
马双成
汪祺
WEN Hairuo;YAN Yujing;SONG Jie;AO Rui;MA Shuangcheng;WANG Qi(National Center for Safety Evaluation and Monitoring of Drugs,National Institutes for Food and Drug Control/Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs,Beijing 100176,China;Institute for TCM and Ethnic Medicine Control,National Institutes for Food and Drug Control,Beijing 100050,China)
出处
《中国药房》
CAS
北大核心
2020年第1期18-23,共6页
China Pharmacy
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81503347,81503068)
国家重大新药创制专项(No.2018ZX09201-017)