期刊文献+

博士学位论文评审指标体系可靠吗——基于全数据的信度和效度研究 被引量:10

On Reliability of Doctoral Dissertation Review Indicator System:A study based on reliability and validity of all data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论文评审是学位论文质量评价的重要环节。为了使评审结果能真实地反映博士学位论文的质量和水平,必须首先保证论文评审指标体系的准确性、可靠性和有效性。信度和效度分析是验证指标体系准确性、可靠性和有效性的重要方法。文章利用北京师范大学五年博士学位论文匿名评审全数据量化结果,对评审指标体系的信度和效度进行实证研究。结果表明,目前广泛采用的评审指标体系具有良好的信度和效度,能够真实地反映博士学位论文的质量和水平。 Dissertation evaluation is an important link in the dissertation quality evaluation.In order to ensure that the evaluation results can truthfully reflect the quality of the doctoral dissertation,we must ensure the accuracy,reliability,and validity of the dissertation evaluation indicator system and the reliability and validity analysis is an important method to verify the accuracy,reliability,and validity of the indicator system.The authors use the outcomes of the full data quantification of the anonymous doctoral dissertation evaluation at Beijing Normal University in the past five years to carry out an empirical study on the reliability and validity of the system.The results show that the evaluation indicator system widely applied is fairly reliable and valid,which can truly reflect the quality and standard of doctoral dissertations.
作者 刘春荣 郭海燕 吴瀚霖 LIU Chunrong;GUO Haiyan;WU Hanlin(Faculty of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875;Office of Academic Degree Committee,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875;College of Information Science and Technology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
出处 《研究生教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期80-84,共5页 Journal of Graduate Education
基金 中国学位与研究生教育学会重点课题“‘三位一体’研究生学位论文质量评价与监测体系研究”(编号:A2-2015Y0407-011)
关键词 博士学位论文评审 指标体系 信度分析 效度分析 doctoral dissertation review indicator system reliability analysis validity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

共引文献365

同被引文献96

引证文献10

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部