期刊文献+

选择数量对满意度的影响——一个有调节的中介模型 被引量:1

Effect of Option Number on Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 增加选择数量是否会提高满意度是经济学、心理学和营销学的热点问题。当消费者对某一刺激目标同时存在积极和消极的评价时,即矛盾态度怎样影响选择数量和满意度的关系 2个实验结果表明,选择数量对满意度的影响是通过决策困难水平实现的,当选择数量影响决策困难水平时,会产生选择超载。矛盾态度对决策困难水平与满意度的关系有调节作用,对矛盾态度较高者,选择"多多益善",选择数量增加使消费者满意度提高;相反,对矛盾态度较低者,选择"适可而止",选择数量增加使消费者满意度降低。 Whether increasing the number of choices will improve satisfaction is a hot issue in economics, psychology and marketing. How does ambivalence affect choice overload when consumers have both positive and negative evaluations of one stimulus target? Two experimental results show that the effect of option number on satisfaction is suggested through the level of decision-making difficulty. When the option number affects the level of decision-making difficulty, choice overload will occur. Ambivalent attitude has a moderating effect on the relationship between decision-making difficulty level and satisfaction. For those with higher ambivalence, the more the better. On the contrary, for those with lower ambivalence, the product is "enough is enough", and the increase of option number will reduce consumer satisfaction.
作者 夏春玉 林让 杨宜苗 XIA Chun-yu;LIN Rang;YANG Yi-miao(School of Management,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025,China)
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期5-14,共10页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“消费者感知零售商创新性:结构测量及对感知价值和消费者忠诚的三重作用路径与边界条件研究”(71872030)
关键词 选择数量 选择超载 矛盾态度 满意度 option number ambivalent attitude choice overload satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献46

  • 1Aaker, J., Drolet, A., & Griffin, D. (2008). Recalling Mixed Emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 268-278.
  • 2Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421-1432.
  • 3Armitage, C. J., Povey, R., & Arden, M. A. (2003). Evidence for discontinuity patterns across the stages of change: A role for attitudinal ambivalence. Psychology and Health, 18, 373-386.
  • 4Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
  • 5Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (2002). Ambivalence and response amplification: A motivational perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1143-1152.
  • 6Bettman, L R., Lute, M. F., and Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187-217.
  • 7Breekler, S. J. (1994). A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitudinal ambivalence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 350-365.
  • 8Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J, A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
  • 9Cavazza, N., & Butebra, F. (2008). Bending without breaking:Examining the role of attitudinal ambivalence in resisting persuasive communication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1-15.
  • 10Cervellon, M. C. (2005). Ambivalent and dual attitudes: Attitude Conflicts and their impact on decision making behavior. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Unpublished.

共引文献76

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部