期刊文献+

控制自复位高墩高阶效应的双摇摆界面法

Double-swing interface method for controlling higher order mode effect of self-reset high piers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为控制只在墩底设置1个摇摆界面的自复位高墩(结构1)的高阶模态地震响应,研究了分别在1/2墩高截面(结构2)和墩身弯矩最大截面(结构3)设置第2个摇摆界面的双摇摆界面法的控制效果。以3种强度条件下的7条地震动作为输入,利用时程分析获得了3种结构的墩身最大弯矩、最大剪力及墩顶最大水平位移。通过对比分析发现:结构2不能有效控制高阶模态效应,而结构3能有效控制高阶模态效应。随地震动及其强度的不同,与结构1相比,结构3能使墩身最大弯矩及最大剪力分别减小20%~46%和19%~65%,但结构3会增大墩顶最大水平位移,需采用有效手段加以控制。 In order to control higher order mode seismic response of a self-reset high pier with a swing interface set up at pier bottom(named structure 1),the control effect of the double-swing interface method was studied through using structure 2 and structure 3,respectively.Structure 2 and 3 were formed by setting up the second swing interface at 1/2 pier height and the cross-section with the maximum pier body bending moment of structure 1,respectively.Seven ground motion records with 3 different intensities were taken as inputs,the 3 structures’the maximum pier body bending moments,the maximum shear forces and the maximum pier top horizontal displacements were obtained with the time history analysis method.It was found that structure 2 can’t effectively control higher order mode effect,while structure 3 can;compared with structure 1,structure 3 can make the maximum pier body bending moment and the maximum shear force be decreased by 20%-46% and 19%-65%,respectively according to different ground motion records and their intensities;but structure 3 can increase the maximum pier top horizontal displacement,and this displacement needs to control with effective means.
作者 张育智 秦搏聪 周凯旋 黄荣 胡豪 刘冬冬 ZHANG Yuzhi;QIN Bocong;ZHOU Kaixuan;HUANG Rong;HU Hao;LIU Dongdong(School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China)
出处 《振动与冲击》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期274-280,共7页 Journal of Vibration and Shock
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2682016CX005) 西南交通大学第十二期个性化实验项目(GX201812136)
关键词 摇摆自复位高墩 高阶模态效应 双摇摆界面法 时程分析法 self-reset high pier higher order mode effect double-swing interface method time history analysis method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献68

  • 1夏修身,陈兴冲,王常峰.铁路高墩弹塑性地震反应分析[J].世界地震工程,2008,24(2):117-121. 被引量:23
  • 2欧进萍,吴斌.摩擦型与软钢屈服型耗能器的性能与减振效果的试验比较[J].地震工程与工程振动,1995,15(3):73-87. 被引量:60
  • 3梁智垚,李建中.桥梁高墩合理计算模型探讨[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(2):91-98. 被引量:34
  • 4FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 5FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 6FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 7Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 8Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 9Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 10Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.

共引文献262

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部