诉的利益视阀下我国行政公益诉讼的原告资格探析

Study of Plaintiff’s Qualification in Administrative Public Interest Litigation from Perspective of Litigation Interest in China

经过两年的试点工作,我国正式建立了行政公益诉讼制度,现行制度中只有检察机关具有原告资格,关于检察机关能否作为唯一起诉主体的问题引起学界的热议。目前,我国行政公益诉讼的原告资格存在着拘泥于利害关系、与行政公诉相混淆以及对检察机关提起诉讼的法律地位有争议等问题,导致我国行政公益诉讼制度原告资格的狭隘化。以检察机关作为唯一原告的规定实际上违背了"诉的利益"的诉讼学原理,因此,我国应当从"诉的利益"角度出发,逐步扩大原告资格的范围以完善行政公益诉讼制度。

After two years'experimental work,the administrative public interest litigation system is formally erected in China.This system regulates that the procuratorial organ is the only entity eligible for the plaintiff which has aroused hot debate in the academic circle.At present,there are still many problems with the system,to name a few,the plaintiff is only defined in relation to interest issues;its role overlaps with administrative public prosecution;and a procuratorial organ's legal status is still questionable,thus,the regulation actually violates the Principle of Interest of Litigation the principle in litigation theory.This paper proposes that a vision of the Interest of Litigation shall be adopted,and others be allowed to be the plaintiff in order to improve the administrative public interest litigation system.