摘要
研究运用经济行为学的博弈实验法,探索了不同人际信任和合作的培养模式的效果问题。实验一和实验二分别采用两人信任博弈和六人公共品博弈实验范式,探讨了替代强化、直接强化和对照组等不同培养模式下的信任和合作关系变化情况。研究结果显示:1、直接强化组的培养效果好于替代强化组;2、从实验范式角度而言,两人信任博弈范式下的培养效果优于六人公共品博弈范式;3、相比于直接强化组而言,替代强化组的培养效果不受实验范式和实验情境的影响,具有跨实验情境的一致性和稳定性。因此,在人际信任和合作关系的培养过程中,相比于直接强化模式更容易受时空的限制和实验效应的影响,观察学习等替代强化的模式更具有可行性及推广性。
The study uses the game experiment method of economic behavior to explore the effects of different interpersonal trust and cooperation training models.Experiments 1 and 2 respectively use the two-person trust game and the six-person public goods game experiment paradigm to explore the changes in trust and cooperation between different training modes such as substitution strengthening,direct reinforcement and control group.The results show that:1.Special trust relationship can be established and cultivated in the way of direct reinforcement and alternative reinforcement,and the former’s training effect is better than the latter;2.From the experimental paradigm perspective,the training effect of the two people in the trust game paradigm is better than that of the six people.Game paradigm;3,compared with the direct strengthening group,the training effect of the alternative strengthening group is not affected by the experimental paradigm and experimental context,and has the consistency and stability across experimental situations.Therefore,in the process of cultivating interpersonal trust and cooperation,compared with the direct reinforcement mode,it is more susceptible to the limitations of time and space and experimental effects.The model of alternative reinforcement such as observational learning is more feasible and popular.
作者
何志芳
杨艳
刘建平
He Zhifang;Yang Yan;Liu Jianping(School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022;College of Humanities,Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanchang 330004)
出处
《心理学探新》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期533-539,共7页
Psychological Exploration
基金
2018年江西省高校人文社科项目(XL18101)
关键词
人际信任
强化
替代强化
博弈实验
interpersonal trust
reinforcement
substitution reinforcement
game experiment