期刊文献+

故事说理、儒术选士与汉代子书的兴衰

Reasoning through Storytelling,Confucianism as Established Standard for Official Selection and Rise and Fall of Philosophy Books in the Han Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 秦始皇焚书使学术生存空间受到严重挤压,但由于历时不长,并未形成真正的断绝。汉代学术与战国学术血脉相通、前后相继,战国末期形成的子书采用故事说理的思维特征被汉代子书完整地继承下来。以西汉武帝朝为分界,汉代子书呈现出前兴后衰的局面,此由内外两种因素促合而成。从外部因素来讲,一方面,儒术为选仕标准的确立使百家之学成为"无用"之术,其生存空间被迅速压缩;另一方面,"师法"、"家法"的遵循使得儒家子学因循有馀,创新乏力。就汉代子书自身而言,战国末期形成的故事说理思维特质与司马迁《史记》异辕同轨,后者编撰的成功引领史学新时代的到来,且自此长盛不衰。在内外两种因素的作用下,子书创作在西汉后期走上非主流的不归路。 The burning of books by Qin Shi Huang(the First Emperor of a unified China and founder of the Qin dynasty) posed a big threat to academic development, but it didn’t cause a break in scholarship as it didn’t last a long time. The scholarship of Han Dynasty is the inheritance and continuation of that of the Warring States period. At the end of the Warring States period, philosophy books mostly illustrated points with stories, which was completely inherited by philosophy books in the Han Dynasty. The reign of Emperor Hanwu is a watershed in the development of philosophy books. Philosophy books flourished before the reign of Emperor Hanwu but declined after his reign, which was caused by the combination of internal and external factors. As for external factors, on the one hand, the establishment of Confucianism as standard for selecting officials rendered other scholastic thoughts "useless", and thus greatly compressed their development space. On the other hand, the adherence to "Shi Fa(tracing the source)" and "Jia Fa(evolving into a school)" made Confucian teachings have too much conformity but little creativity. As for the philosophy books of the Han Dynasty, their characteristics of reasoning with stories was very much the same as the tactic Sima Qian used in Records of History. Sima Qian’s success ushered in a new era of historiography, and it has endured ever since. Under the influence of both internal and external factors, in the late Western Han Dynasty, the creation of philosophy books took a non-mainstream path and there is no turning back ever since.
作者 李建华 LI Jian-hua(College of Arts,Ludong University,Yantai,Shandong,264025)
机构地区 鲁东大学文学院
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期145-151,共7页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词 汉代子书 故事说理 史兴子衰 儒术选士 战国子书 儒家子学 philosophy books of Han Dynasty reasoning through storytelling rise of history books and fall of philosophy books Confucianism as established standard for official selection philosophy books of the Warring States period new philosophy books of Confucianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1郎菁.“兰台”职官典故考述[J].唐都学刊,2009,25(1):21-25. 被引量:4
  • 2范学辉.秦始皇在“独尊儒术”过程中的历史作用商榷[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),1994,17(4):71-74. 被引量:1
  • 3《汉书·儒林传》.
  • 4曹丕.《典论·论文》[A].严可均.《全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文·全三国文》卷八[C].中华书局,1958年版..
  • 5蔡质.《汉仪》[A]..《续汉书·礼仪志》(中)[C].,..
  • 6徐复观.《先汉经学之形成》.
  • 7徐复观.《王充论考》.
  • 8张心澂.伪书通考索引[M]商务印书馆,1954.
  • 9《汉官仪》.
  • 10《续汉志》.

共引文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部