期刊文献+

我国监狱罪犯矫治模式及效能问题实证研究——以163例12348中国法网监狱矫治个案为例分析 被引量:2

Empirical Research on the Prisoner Correction Model and its Efficacy——Analysis of 163 cases of prison corrections in 12348 legal services of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过对163例12348中国法网中的各监狱罪犯教育矫治典型个案数据进行实证分析,研究罪犯的性别、年龄、文化程度等人口学特征,分析我国监狱教育矫治罪犯的模式特征及矫治效能问题。结果显示:监狱矫治罪犯在年龄、是否顽危犯、法制教育、管控措施、心理措施等维度上存在统计学上的显著性差异;我国的监禁矫治措施对某些罪犯具有较好效能。这表明我国监狱矫治罪犯工作已形成具有中国特色的罪犯教育矫治模式且已在各监狱扩展开来,心理矫治措施已在较多监狱推广使用并取得了较好效能。 This article empirical analyzes the 163 cases of typical prisoner education corrections in the 12348 legal services of China,studies prisoner's demographic characteristics,such as gender,age,and education,and analyzes the model characteristics and correction efficacy of prison education corrections in China.The results show that there are statistically significant differences in prison corrections in terms of age,whether or not they are perilous,legal education,control measures,psychological measures,etc.;China's prison corrections have a good effect on some offenders.This shows that the prisoner correction model with Chinese characteristics has been formed and expanded,and psychological correction measures have been popularized in many prisons and achieved good results.
作者 王超 Wang Chao(Hebei Vocational College of Politics and Law,Shijiazhuang Hebei 050061)
出处 《警学研究》 2019年第6期31-58,共28页 Police Science Research
关键词 监狱矫治模式 矫治效能 数据分析 方差分析 prisoner correction model corrective efficacy data analysis variance analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1鲍遂献.影响我国罪犯改造质量的原因与对策[J].法律学习与研究,1992(4):39-43. 被引量:1
  • 2鲁嘉微,叶青.坚持理论创新 注重试点推进——湖南省罪犯改造质量评估体系研究成果与“湖南模式”[J].中国司法,2006(12):43-45. 被引量:2
  • 3See Donald Thomas Campbell, Reforms as Experiments, 24(4) American Psychologist (1969).
  • 4See David Lawrence Sackett. , Sharon. E. Straus, W. Scott Richardson, William Rosenberg, & R. Brian Haynes, Evidence - based medi- cine: How tO practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
  • 5See Robert Martinson, What works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform, 35 (Spring) The Public Interest (1974), p24.
  • 6See Robert Martinson, What works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform, 35 (Spring) The Public Interest (1974), p25.
  • 7Ted Palmer, Martinson Revisited, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, July 1975, pp. 133 -152.
  • 8Edward J. Latessa, Alexander Holsinger, 3"ne importance of Evaluating Correctional Programmer: Assessing outcomes and Quality, 2(4) Cor- rections Management Quarterly ( 1998), Aspen Publishers, Inc, pp. 22 - 29.
  • 9Mark W. Lipsey and Francis T. Cullen, The effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews, vol. 3 Annual Re- view of Law and Social Science(2007).
  • 10Lawrence W. Sherman, Denise C. Gottfredson, Doris L MacKenzie, John Eck, Peter Rcuter, and Shawn D. Bushway, Preventing Crime: What works, what doesnt, whatg promising Washington D. C. : National Institute of Justice, 1998.

共引文献116

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部