代位仲裁的可行性研究——以债务人与次债务人合同仲裁条款对代位权人的效力为中心

A Study on the Feasibility of Subrogation Arbitration——Taking the Effectiveness of the Contract Arbitration Clause between the Debtor and the Sub-debtor on the Subrogation Agent as the Center

关于代位权人是否受到债务人和次债务人之间有效仲裁条款的约束,司法实务中存在两种截然不同的裁判观点以及折衷处理模式,但似乎都难以实现对债权人和次债务人双方的均衡保护。随着民商事主体交往的多样化和权利义务关系的复杂化,仲裁协议的效力应当适度扩张。在次债务人基于仲裁条款提出管辖异议时,认可代位权人受到债务人和次债务人之间有效仲裁条款的约束,允许代位权人提起代位仲裁,才是协调次债务人程序选择利益和代位权人实体权利之间关系的合理路径。

In practice,there are two different views and a compromise processing mode on whether the subrogation agent is bound by the effective arbitration clause between the debtor and the sub-debtor.None of three modes seems likely to achieve a balanced protection for creditors and sub-debtors.With the diversification of civil and commercial exchanges and the complexity of rights and obligations,the effectiveness of arbitration agreement should be appropriately expanded.When the sub-debtor raises jurisdictional objection based on the arbitration clause,it is necessary to recognize that the subrogation agent is bound by the effective arbitration clause between the debtor and the sub-debtor and allow the subrogation agent to initiate subrogation arbitration,which is the reasonable way to coordinate the relationship between the sub-debtor's procedural interests of choice and the subrogation agent's substantive rights.