期刊文献+

怎样的评估才能有益于学科发展——“双一流”背景下一流学科评估办法研究 被引量:4

On the Sort of Assessment Conducive to Disciplinary Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一流学科评估是对学科发展质量的判断,是对学科知识生产能力和水平、人才培养质量和水准,以及对社会、国家乃至世界所做出贡献的评判。学科评估更应指导学科发展,激发学科发展的内生动力,鼓励学科在发展路径及发展举措等方面所做的探索,促进学科向内自省、向历史承接,通过提供持续的激励机制、监督机制和惩罚机制来规范学科建设行为,激励学科创新与持续成长。 The first-class discipline accreditation is the judgement on the quality of disciplinary development as well as on the productivity and level of disciplinary knowledge, quality and level of talent cultivation, and the contribution of some discipline to the society, the nation and even the world. Disciplinary accreditation should guide the disciplinary development, activate the internal motivation of disciplinary development, encourage the exploration of the disciplines in development approaches and measures, and promote the introspection and historical inheritance of disciplines. Disciplinary accreditation should regulate disciplinary construction, stimulate disciplinary innovation, and facilitate the sustainable growth of disciplines through continuous application of incentive, supervision and punishment mechanism.
作者 闫丽霞 YAN Lixia(Suzhou University,Suzhou 215123,Jiangsu,China;Yancheng Teachers College,Yancheng 224002,Jiangsu,China)
出处 《扬州大学学报(高教研究版)》 2019年第6期17-21,共5页 Journal of Yangzhou University(Higher Education Study Edition)
基金 2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金“中国近现代高等教育编年纪事研究”(17YJA880110)
关键词 学科评估 学科建设 学科发展 学科创新 disciplinary accreditation disciplinary construction disciplinary development disciplinary innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献80

共引文献238

同被引文献69

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部