期刊文献+

GnRH激动剂长方案中不同促排卵药物对卵巢慢反应分娩结局的影响 被引量:4

Effects of Different Ovulatory Drugs on Clinical Outcomes in the Long GnRH agonist Protocol with Suboptimal Ovarian Response
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)方案中,卵巢储备正常患者发生卵巢慢反应后,添加含黄体生成素(LH)活性的不同药物对体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)助孕结局的影响。[方法]纳入卵巢储备功能正常、采用GnRH激动剂方案促排卵并发生卵巢慢反应的不孕患者,共872例。按照添加不同药物分为小剂量人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)组、人重组黄体生成素(rLH)组及人绝经期促性腺激素(H MG)组,回顾性分析3组的实验室参数和临床结局。[结果]hCG组采用超长方案促排卵比例高于HMG组(14.3%vs.1.1%,P<0.001);hCG组Gn使用天数及使用总量较HMG组增加[15.0(13.0~16.8)vs.13.0(12.0~15.0)d,P=0.027;2925(2531~3900)vs.2550(2100~3225)U,P=0.046];rLH组的Gn使用天数及使用总量较HMG组减少[13.0(12.0~14.0)vs.13.0(12.0~15.0)d,P=0.009;2400(1950~3075)vs.2550(2100~3225)U,P=0.009]。hCG组中包括了添加HMG或rLH效果不明显者15例,占hCG组53.6%。hCG组、rLH组及HMG组的临床妊娠率(69.2%,58.6%vs.63.8%,P>0.05)和活产率(65.4%,49.6%vs.53.1%,P>0.05)均相当。[结论]卵巢储备功能正常者在GnRH激动剂方案中发生卵巢慢反应时,添加含LH活性的不同药物均可改善卵巢反应,获得相当的妊娠及分娩结局,小剂量hCG在添加HMG或LH后效果不明显者仍可获得相当的效果。 【Objective】To investigate the effect of adding different preparations containing luteinizing hormone activity in patients with normal ovarian reserve but suboptimal response during GnRH agonist protocol when undergoing IVF/ICSIET.【Methods】872 infertile patients with normal ovarian reserve but suboptimal response to FSH during GnRH agonist protocol were enrolled.According to the supplementation of different preparations containing LH activity,patients were divided into three groups,including low-dose hCG group(n=28),rLH group(n=319)and HMG group(n=525).The clinical parameters and pregnancy outcomes were retrospectively compared among three groups.【Results】The proportion of ultra-long GnRH-a protocol in hCG group was higher than that in HMG group(14.3%vs.1.1%,P<0.001).The total duration and dosage gonadotrophin in hCG group were more than that in HMG group[15.0(13.0~16.8)vs.13.0(12.0~15.0)days,P=0.027;2925(2531~3900)vs.2550(2100~3225)U,P=0.046].The total duration and dosage gonadotrophin in rLH group were less than that in HMG group[13.0(12.0~14.0)vs.13.0(12.0~15.0)days,P=0.009;2400(1950~3075)vs.2550(2100~3225)U,P=0.009].There were 53.6%(15/28)patients who still showed suboptimal response after the administration of HMG or rLH in hCG group.The clinical pregnancy rate(69.2%,58.6%vs.63.8%;P>0.05)and live birth rate(65.4%,49.6%vs.53.1%;P>0.05)were similar among these groups.【Conclusions】For patients with normal ovarian reserve but suboptimal response duringGnRH agonist protocol,the supplementation of different preparations containing LH activity showed comparable effect on pregnancy outcomes.The addition of low-dose hCG was effective even when patients still showed suboptimal response after the administration of HMG or rLH.
作者 唐小饰 温灿鑫 潘萍 李予 TANG Xiao-shi;WEN Can-xin;PAN Ping;LI Yu(Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Beijing Aerospace General Hospital,Beijing 100076,China;IVF center,Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,China)
出处 《中山大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期127-134,共8页 Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University:Medical Sciences
基金 广州市科技计划项目产学研协同创新重大专项民生科技专题(201704020046) 广东省中医药建设专项资金名优中成药二次开发项目(20174002)
关键词 促性腺激素释放激素激动剂 垂体降调节 卵巢慢反应 黄体生成素 gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist pituitary down-regulation suboptimal response luteinizing hormone
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献45

  • 1李洁,周灿权,钟依平,欧建平,林雯青,庄广伦.不同小剂量促性腺激素释放激素激动剂在体外受精-胚胎移植中应用的比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(4):269-270. 被引量:39
  • 2李洁,谭真,任姿,庄广伦.可控制性卵巢刺激治疗中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂降调节与卵巢过度抑制[J].生殖医学杂志,2007,16(5):306-308. 被引量:24
  • 3Wong PC, Qiao J, Ho C, et al. Current opinion on use of luteinizing hormone supplementation in assisted reproduction therapy:an Asian perspective[J/OL]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2011,23:81-90.
  • 4Lahoud R,A1-Jefout M,Tyler J,et al. A relative reduction in midfollicular LH concentrations during GnRH agonist IVF / ICSI cycles leads to lower live birth rates[J]. Hum Reprod, 2006,21 : 2645-2649.
  • 5Ben-Amor AF. The effect of luteinising hormone administered during late follicular phase in normo-ovulatory women undergoing in vitro fertilization [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15 : 46-50.
  • 6Marrs R, Meldrum D, Muasher S, et al. Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment rJ/OL]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2004,8 : 175-182.
  • 7Alviggi C,Clarizia R, Mollo A, et al. Outlook; who needs LH in ovarian stimulation?[J/OL]. Reprod BioMed Online, 2006,12 : 599-607.
  • 8Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response : to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011,26 : 1616-1624.
  • 9Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli MC, et al. Exogenous luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction techniques [ J ]. Fertil Steril, 2004, 82 1521-1526.
  • 10De Placido G, Alvigg C, Perino A, et al. Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial[J]. Hum Reprod, 2005,20 : 390-396.

共引文献50

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部