哲学咨商方法的比较——以瑞比的哲学咨商法与儒家哲学启发的咨商历程为例

Comparison of Philosophical Counseling Methodologies:Taking Peter B.Raabe’s Methodology of Philosophical Counseling and the Confucianism-inspired Philosophical Counseling Progress as Examples

加拿大学者瑞比创制的"自由交谈"等四阶段哲学咨商方法,与儒家哲学"克胜收摄"的启发式咨商方法,两者虽然具有中西哲学起始点与展现场域的差异,但是在助人工具、咨商方法和历程等方面亦有其功能之相通互补之处。比较和分析这两种哲学咨商方法,开展哲学咨商实务的个案成效差异之验证性探究,不仅有助于我们理解中西哲学各自的助人精髓,更利于我们汲取中西哲学咨商方法的精华,推进当代哲学咨商工作的发展。

This paper aims to discuss the comparison of two methodologies of philosophical counseling:the four-stage model of philosophical counseling such as "free floating" proposed by Canadian scholar Peter B.Raabe,and the Confucianism-inspired philosophical counseling progress of "Keh-Sheng-Shou-Sheh".As to these two methodologies of philosophical counseling,there are basic differences of starting-points and demonstrating fields.however,in the respect of helping others,counseling methodology and counseling progress,there are functional complement and intercommunication among these two methodologies of philosophical counseling.By comparing and analyzing the two methodologies of philosophical counseling,and developing the confirmatory exploration of effectiveness differences in each case of philosophical counseling in practice,it can not only help us understand the essence of helping others both in Chinese philosophy and Western philosophy,but also enable us to derive the essence of both Chinese and Western philosophical counseling methodologies,in order to promote the development of contemporary philosophical counseling works.