基于“论辩充分性”标准的论辩框架研究——以“刻意隐喻”论辩为例

Study of Argumentation Evaluating Framework Based on the Criterion of “Dialectical Adequacy”——A Case Study of Argumentation on“Deliberate Metaphor Theory”

文章基于“论辩充分性”标准,提取出了一套论辩评估框架。该框架分为两部分:一是“标准反对意见”评估框架,旨在评估论辩者是否在众多的反对意见中找出了“标准反对意见”;二是“优秀论辩”的评估框架,旨在评估论辩者是否适当地回应了已找出的“标准反对意见”。以上两个框架对于论辩的分析和评估具有一定的参考意义。

This paper,based on the criterion of“Dialectical Adequacy”,extracted a set of argumentation evaluation framework by evaluating the argumentation between Gibbs and Steen on“Deliberate Metaphor Theory”.The framework includes two parts:one is the evaluation framework of“The Standard Objections”in“The Specification Problem”,which aims to help arguer find“The Standard Objections”among the numerous objections raised by the opponent.The second part is“Dialectical Excellence”framework,which aims to assess whether the arguer has properly responded to“The Standard Objections”.The above two frameworks have certain reference value in analyzing,evaluating and reconstructing academic debates.