期刊文献+

Recent advances in diagnostic upper endoscopy 被引量:16

Recent advances in diagnostic upper endoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND Esophageo-gastro-duodenoscopy(EGD)is an important procedure used for detection and diagnosis of esophago-gastric lesions.There exists no consensus on the technique of examination.AIM To identify recent advances in diagnostic EGDs to improve diagnostic yield.METHODS We queried the PubMed database for relevant articles published between January 2001 and August 2019 as well as hand searched references from recently published endoscopy guidelines.Keywords used included free text and MeSH terms addressing quality indicators and technological innovations in EGDs.Factors affecting diagnostic yield and EGD quality were identified and divided into the follow segments:Pre endoscopy preparation,sedation,examination schema,examination time,routine biopsy,image enhanced endoscopy and future developments.RESULTS We identified 120 relevant abstracts of which we utilized 67 of these studies in our review.Adequate pre-endoscopy preparation with simethicone and pronase increases gastric visibility.Proper sedation,especially with propofol,increases patient satisfaction after procedure and may improve detection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions.There is a movement towards mandatory picture documentation during EGD as well as dedicating sufficient time for examination improves diagnostic yield.The use of image enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy improves detection of squamous cell carcinoma and gastric neoplasm.The magnifying endoscopy simple diagnostic algorithm is useful for diagnosis of early gastric cancer.CONCLUSION There is a steady momentum in the past decade towards improving diagnostic yield,quality and reporting in EGDs.Other interesting innovations,such as Raman spectroscopy,endocytoscopy and artificial intelligence may have widespread endoscopic applications in the near future. BACKGROUND Esophageo-gastro-duodenoscopy(EGD) is an important procedure used for detection and diagnosis of esophago-gastric lesions. There exists no consensus on the technique of examination.AIM To identify recent advances in diagnostic EGDs to improve diagnostic yield.METHODS We queried the Pub Med database for relevant articles published between January2001 and August 2019 as well as hand searched references from recently published endoscopy guidelines. Keywords used included free text and Me SH terms addressing quality indicators and technological innovations in EGDs.Factors affecting diagnostic yield and EGD quality were identified and divided into the follow segments: Pre endoscopy preparation, sedation, examination schema, examination time, routine biopsy, image enhanced endoscopy and future developments.RESULTS We identified 120 relevant abstracts of which we utilized 67 of these studies in our review. Adequate pre-endoscopy preparation with simethicone and pronase increases gastric visibility. Proper sedation, especially with propofol, increases patient satisfaction after procedure and may improve detection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. There is a movement towards mandatory picture documentation during EGD as well as dedicating sufficient time for examination improves diagnostic yield. The use of image enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy improves detection of squamous cell carcinoma and gastric neoplasm. The magnifying endoscopy simple diagnostic algorithm is useful for diagnosis of early gastric cancer.CONCLUSION There is a steady momentum in the past decade towards improving diagnostic yield, quality and reporting in EGDs. Other interesting innovations, such as Raman spectroscopy, endocytoscopy and artificial intelligence may have widespread endoscopic applications in the near future.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2020年第4期433-447,共15页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Upper endoscopy GASTROSCOPY Quality indicators Gastric cancer Upper endoscopy Gastroscopy Quality indicators Gastric cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM.Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN2008. Int J Cancer 2010; 127: 2893-2917 [PMID: 21351269 DOI:10.1002/ijc.25516].
  • 2Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Yeh R, Gotoda T. Endoscopic mucosalresection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. JClin Oncol 2005; 23: 4490-4498 [PMID: 16002839 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.19.935].
  • 3Ezoe Y, Muto M, Uedo N, Doyama H, Yao K, Oda I, Kaneko K,Kawahara Y, Yokoi C, Sugiura Y, Ishikawa H, Takeuchi Y, KanekoY, Saito Y. Magnifying narrowband imaging is more accurate thanconventional white-light imaging in diagnosis of gastric mucosalcancer. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 2017-2025.e3 [PMID:21856268 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.08.007].
  • 4Tao G, Xing-Hua L, Ai-Ming Y, Wei-Xun Z, Fang Y, Xi W, Li-Yin W, Chong-Mei L, Gui-Jun F, Hui-Jun S, Dong-Sheng W, YueL, Xiao-Qing L, Jia-Ming Q. Enhanced magnifying endoscopy fordifferential diagnosis of superficial gastric lesions identified withwhite-light endoscopy. Gastric Cancer 2014; 17: 122-129 [PMID:23494118 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-013-0250-1].
  • 5Maki S, Yao K, Nagahama T, Beppu T, Hisabe T, Takaki Y, HiraiF, Matsui T, Tanabe H, Iwashita A. Magnifying endoscopy withnarrow-band imaging is useful in the differential diagnosis betweenlow-grade adenoma and early cancer of superficial elevated gastriclesions. Gastric Cancer 2013; 16: 140-146 [PMID: 22592604 DOI:10.1007/s10120-012-0160-7].
  • 6Miwa K, Doyama H, Ito R, Nakanishi H, Hirano K, InagakiS, Tominaga K, Yoshida N, Takemura K, Yamada S, KanekoY, Katayanagi K, Kurumaya H, Okada T, Yamagishi M. Canmagnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging be useful forlow grade adenomas in preoperative biopsy specimens- GastricCancer 2012; 15: 170-178 [PMID: 22407064 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0093-6].
  • 7Ezoe Y, Muto M, Horimatsu T, Minashi K, Yano T, Sano Y, ChibaT, Ohtsu A. Magnifying narrow-band imaging versus magnifyingwhite-light imaging for the differential diagnosis of gastric smalldepressive lesions: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71: 477-484 [PMID: 20189506 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.036].
  • 8Kato M, Kaise M, Yonezawa J, Toyoizumi H, Yoshimura N,Yoshida Y, Kawamura M, Tajiri H. Magnifying endoscopy withnarrow-band imaging achieves superior accuracy in the differentialdiagnosis of superficial gastric lesions identified with white-lightendoscopy: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72:523-529 [PMID: 20598685 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.041].
  • 9Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Ragunath K. Magnifyingendoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancer.Endoscopy 2009; 41: 462-467 [PMID: 19418401 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214594].
  • 10Wanders LK, East JE, Uitentuis SE, Leeflang MM, DekkerE. Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy,autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy foroptical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol2013; 14: 1337-1347 [PMID: 24239209 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045].

共引文献23

同被引文献150

引证文献16

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部