期刊文献+

无损检测在钢结构疲劳损伤检测中的应用研究 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 钢结构疲劳问题日益突出,目前人们对于钢结构疲劳损伤问题检测手段极为有限,纵观国内国外的研究进展,钢梁焊缝疲劳损伤检测技术多种多样,但存在着检测时间长、效率低、需要对检测表面进行处理等缺点,现有检测技术只能寻找已经存在的缺陷,不能发现和预测将会要发生的缺陷,因此有必要研究一种新的检测方法来推进钢梁焊缝疲劳损伤的无损检测技术的发展。金属磁记忆技术相较传统无损检测技术有着无损伤、灵敏度高、早期检测等特点优势,文章着重比较了金属磁记忆检测技术与传统无损检测技术的优缺点,为钢结构的疲劳损伤问题提供了更多更好的检测手段。 The fatigue problem of steel structure is becoming increasingly prominent.At present,the detection methods for fatigue damage of steel structure are very limited.Throughout the research progress at home and abroad,there are a variety of fatigue damage detection techniques for steel beam welds.However,there are some shortcomings,such as long detection time,low efficiency,and there is need to treat the inspection surface,and so on.The existing detection technology can only find the existing defects,but can not find and predict the defects that will occur.Therefore,it is necessary to study a new testing method to promote the development of non-destructive testing technology for fatigue damage of steel beam welds.Compared with the traditional non-destructive testing technology,the metal magnetic memory technology has the advantages of no damage,high sensitivity and early detection.This paper focuses on the comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the metal magnetic memory testing technology and the traditional non-destructive testing technology.It provides more and better testing methods for fatigue damage of steel structures.
作者 刘定坤
出处 《科技创新与应用》 2020年第7期169-170,共2页 Technology Innovation and Application
关键词 钢结构 疲劳损伤 无损检测 金属磁记忆 steel structure fatigue damage non-destructive testing metal magnetic memory
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1任吉林,王东升,宋凯,任尚坤,唐继红.应力状态对磁记忆信号的影响[J].航空学报,2007,28(3):724-728. 被引量:38
  • 2Wang Chunsheng, Chen Airong, Chen Weizhen, et al. Application of probabilistic fracture mechanics in evaluation of existing riveted bridges [ J ]. Journal of Bridge Structures, 2006, 2 (4) : 223-232.
  • 3Jiao G T. Reliability analysis of crack growth under random loading considering model updating [ D ]. Trondheim: Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1989.
  • 4Madsen H O. Random fatigue crack growth and inspection [ C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Structural Safety Reliability. Kobe, Japan, 1985 : 475-484.
  • 5Zhao Zhengwei, Haldar A, Breen F L. Fatigue-reliability updating through inspections of steel bridges [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1994,120(5) : 1624-1642.
  • 6Zhao Zhengwei, Haldar A. Bridge fatigue damage evaluation and updating using non-destructive inspections [ J ]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1996,53 (5) :775-788.
  • 7Zhang Ruoxue, Mahadevan S. Fatigue reliability analysis using nondestructive inspection [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2001,127 (8) :957-965.
  • 8Zhang Ruoxue, Mahadevan S. Model uncertainty and Bayesian updating in reliability-based inspection [ J ]. Structural Safety, 2000,22( 2 ) : 145-160.
  • 9Righiniotis T D. Effects of increasing traffic loads on the fatigue reliability of a typical welded bridge detail [ J ]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2006, 28 ( 8 ) : 873-880.
  • 10Dau G J. Ultrasonic sizing capacity of IGSCC and its relation to flaw evaluation procedures [ R ]. Charlotte: Electric Power Research Institude, 1983.

共引文献9

同被引文献24

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部