期刊文献+

白乌鱼与罗非鱼肉的营养物质比较分析 被引量:7

Comparison of Nutrients in White Mullet(Opniocepnalus argus var Kimnra)and Tilapia Meat(Sarotherodon nilotica)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了进一步了解白乌鱼肉的营养价值,比较了白乌鱼与罗非鱼肉的基本营养成分、氨基酸含量、氨基酸价(AAS)、氨基酸指数(EAAI)和蛋白质效价(PER)。结果表明,白乌鱼肉与罗非鱼肉相比,水分含量无显著差异(p>0.05),白乌鱼肉的蛋白含量较高(p<0.05)、脂肪含量较低(p<0.05)、灰分含量较高(p<0.05)。白乌鱼肉中2种风味氨基酸(甘氨酸和谷氨酸)的含量较罗非鱼肉高。与罗非鱼肉相比,白乌鱼肉的必需氨基酸含量较高、氨基酸价较低、氨基酸指数和蛋白质效价较高。总之,白乌鱼肉的蛋白质营养价值高于罗非鱼。 To further understand the nutritional value of white mullet,the basic nutritional components,content of amino acids,amino acid score(AAS),essential amino acid index(EAAI)and protein efficiency ratio(PER)were compared with that of tilapia meat.The results showed that there was no significant difference in moisture content(p>0.05)of white mullet and tilapia meat,but the protein content of white mullet was significant higher(p<0.05),the fat content was significant lower(p<0.05),and the ash content was significant higher(p<0.05)than that of tilapia meat.Two kinds of flavor amino acids(glycine and glutamic acid)in white mullet were higher than those in tilapia meat.Compared with tilapia meat,the content of essential amino acids in white mullet was higher,the AAS was lower,the EAAI and PER were higher.In conclusion,the protein nutritional value of white mullet meat was higher than that of tilapia.
作者 柯欢 李慧 熊伟 张崟 郭思亚 钱琴 陈平平 赵洪玉 李茜雅 KE Huan;LI Hui;XIONG Wei;ZHANG Yin;GUO Siya;QIAN Qin;CHEN Pingping;ZHAO Hongyu;LI Xiya(Key Laboratory for Meat Processing of Sichuan Province,Chengdu University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610106,China)
出处 《农产品加工》 2020年第1期47-49,共3页 Farm Products Processing
关键词 白乌鱼 罗非鱼 蛋白质效价 营养物质 氨基酸价 氨基酸指数 white mullet tilapia protein efficiency ratio nutrients aminoacid score essential aminoacid index
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

共引文献2

同被引文献109

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部