手术室消毒隔离措施应用的效果

Effect of Application of Disinfection and Isolation Measures in Operating Room

目的了解手术室消毒隔离措施应用的效果。方法将本院2016年2月-2018年12月的80例接受手术治疗的患者,随机分组,常规护理组给予常规干预,手术室消毒隔离组开展消毒隔离措施。比较两组满意水平;洗手质量、消毒隔离质量、环境清洁质量;医院感染发生率。结果手术室消毒隔离组的满意水平更高,手术室消毒隔离组的满意水平(95.26±2.21)分,而常规护理组的满意水平是(89.26±2.61)分,t=6.923,P <0.05,差异有统计学意义。手术室消毒隔离组洗手质量、消毒隔离质量、环境清洁质量优于常规护理组,手术室消毒隔离组洗手质量、消毒隔离质量、环境清洁质量分别是(94.79±2.11)分、(94.21±2.21)分和(95.26±2.61)分。而常规护理组洗手质量、消毒隔离质量、环境清洁质量分别是(88.21±2.21)分、(83.57±2.42)分和(81.21±2.57)分,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。手术室消毒隔离组医院感染发生率更少,χ~2=6.923,P <0.05,差异有统计学意义。手术室消毒隔离组医院感染发生率有1例,而常规护理组医院感染发生率有8例。结论接受手术治疗的患者实施消毒隔离措施效果确切,可提高消毒隔离质量,减少医院感染的发生。

Objective To understand the effect of the application of disinfection and isolation measures in the operating room. Methods Eighty patients who underwent surgery from February 2016 to December 2018 in the hospital were randomly divided into groups. The routine nursing group was given routine intervention, and the operating room disinfection and isolation group was carried out disinfection and isolation measures. Compare the satisfaction level of the two groups;the quality of hand washing, the quality of disinfection and isolation, the quality of environmental cleansing;the incidence of nosocomial infection. Results The satisfaction level of the operating room disinfection and isolation group was higher, and the satisfaction level of the operating room disinfection and isolation group was(95.26 ± 2.21) points, while the satisfaction level of the conventional nursing group was(89.26 ± 2.61) points, t = 6.923, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. The quality of hand washing, disinfection and isolation, and environmental cleaning in the operating room disinfection and isolation group were better than those of the conventional care group. The quality of hand washing, disinfection and isolation, and environmental cleaning in the operating room disinfection and isolation group were(94.79 ± 2.11) points and(94.21 ± 2.21) points and(95.26 ± 2.61) points. The quality of hand washing, disinfection and isolation, and environmental cleanliness of the routine care group were(88.21 ± 2.21) points,(83.57 ± 2.42) points, and(81.21 ± 2.57) points, and the differences were statistically significant(P < 0.05). The incidence of nosocomial infection in the operating room disinfection and isolation group was even lower, χ~2 = 6.923, P < 0.05, and the difference was statistically significant. The incidence of nosocomial infection in the operating room disinfection and isolation group was 1 case, while the incidence of nosocomial infection in the routine care group was 8 cases. Conclusion The effect of disinfection and isolation measures on patients underwent surgical treatment is effective, which can improve the quality of disinfection and isolation and reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection.