从补充剂污染角度来看兴奋剂违规行为的过错问题——日本体育仲裁委员会对寺崎浩平兴奋剂违规行为处罚仲裁案例评述

Fault of Doping Violations in View of Supplementary Pollution

日本体育仲裁委员会对寺崎浩平兴奋剂违规行为处罚仲裁案例进行了评述,研究认为,世界反兴奋剂条例(2015版)将“受污染产品”的相关规定,划分在运动员“无重大过错或疏忽缩短禁赛期”之中,将补充剂的污染与运动员是否尽了合理查询义务的过错程度相关联,那么如何从补充剂受污染的角度去综合评价运动员的过错程度则十分必要。该案例对我国的启示如下:正确认识和处理“受污染产品”情形,发挥基层管理机构的治理和社会监督作用,增强对“低过错或无过错”运动员的保护。

The paper comments on the arbitration case of doping violation punishment by Japan Sports Arbitration Commission,and holds that the World Anti-doping regulations(2015 Edition)divide the relevant provisions of contaminated products into the category of athletes*no fault or negligence shortening the prohibition period,and associate the pollution of supplements with the degree of fault that athletes have fulfilled their reasonable inquiry obligations.Then how to comprehensively evaluate the fault degree of athletes from the perspective of supplement pollution is very important.The paper proposes to correctly understand and deal with the situation of contaminated products,give full play to the management of grass-roots management institutions and the role of social supervision to enhance the protection of athletes with less or no faults.