期刊文献+

食管癌同步加量调强放疗与常规调强放疗的效果研究 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨食管癌同步加量调强放疗与常规调强放疗的效果。方法 80例食管癌患者,随机分为同步加量调强放疗组和常规调强放疗组,每组40例。常规调强放疗组采纳常规调强放疗治疗,同步加量调强放疗组则采纳同步加量调强放疗治疗。比较两组治疗效果、治疗前后简明健康量表评分、生存时间、不良反应发生情况。结果同步加量调强放疗组治疗总有效率80.00%明显高于常规调强放疗组的50.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗后的社会功能、生理健康、情感职能评分均高于治疗前,且同步加量调强放疗组社会功能、生理健康、情感职能评分高于常规调强放疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同步加量调强放疗组生存时间(24.55±2.45)个月长于常规调强放疗组的(22.11±2.21)个月,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论食管癌同步加量调强放疗与常规调强放疗的效果比较,前者效果更好,且同步加量调强放疗的操作更为简单。
作者 魏敏
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2020年第2期41-42,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献63

  • 1袁智勇,高黎,徐国镇,易俊林,黄晓东,罗京伟,李素艳,戴建荣.初治鼻咽癌调强放疗的初步结果[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):237-243. 被引量:84
  • 2Shu-Lian Wang,Zhongxing Liao,Helen Liu(,Jaffer Ajani,Stephen Swisher,James D Cox,Ritsuko Komaki.Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(34):5501-5508. 被引量:27
  • 3Dirix P,Nuyts S,Van den Bogaert W.Radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer:a literature review[J].Cancer,2006,107(24):2525-2534.
  • 4Teo PM,Leung SF,Lee WY,et al.Intracavitary brachytherapy significantly enhances local control of early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma:the existence of a dose-tumor-control relationship above conventional tumoricidal dose[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,46(3):445-458.
  • 5Teo PM,Leung SF,Tung SY,et al.Dose-response relationship of nasopharyngeal carcinoma above conventional tumoricidal level:a study by the Hong Kong nasopharyngeal carcinoma study group (HKNPCSG)[J].Radiother Oncol,2006,79(1):27-33.
  • 6Kwong DL,Pow EH,Sham JS,et al.Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a prospective study on disease control and preservation of salivary function[J].Cancer,2004,101(13):1584-1593.
  • 7McMillan AS,Pow EH,Kwong DL,et al.Preservation of quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma:results of a prospective longitudinal study[J].Head Neck,2006,28(4):712-722.
  • 8Eisbruch A,Ten-Haken RK,Kim HM,et al.Dose,volume,and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,45(3):577-587.
  • 9Poortmans PM, Collette L, Bartelink H, et al. The addition of a boost dose on the primary tumour bed after lumpectomy in breast conserv-ing treatment for breast cancer. A summary of' the results of EORTC 22881-10882 "boost versus no boost" trial [J].Cancer Radiother, 2008, 12(6-7) :565-570.
  • 10Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a ran- domized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpeetomy, and lumpec- tomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast caneer[J].N Engl J Med, 2002,347 ( 16 ) : 1233-1241.

共引文献61

同被引文献56

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部