摘要
目的:比较传统交叉钢针固定、平乐半交叉钢针固定治疗儿童髁上骨折的疗效.方法:回顾性分析从2017年1月-2018年3月收治的78例儿童肱骨髁上骨折,其中男性38例,女性40例,年龄为5-12岁,平均年龄8.0岁;传统交叉钢针固定32例、平乐半交叉钢针固定46例;2例发生肘内翻,1例发生钉道口感染,2例出现骨折移位,1例出现尺神经损伤.结果:78例患者术后获4-16个月(平均9个月)随访,参照Flynn肱骨髁上骨折的疗效判定标准将患儿肘关节的功能分为4个等级:优43例,良26例,可7例,差2例.2组手术疗效、术后并发症发生率相当,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:平乐半交叉钢针固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折安全性和手术时间优于传统交叉钢针固定.
Objective:To compare the curative effect of children on the condyle fracture between traditional cross stell needle fixed and Pingle cross steel needle fixed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 78 cases of children on the condyle fracture who had been treated from January 2017 to March 2018 at out department.They were 38 men and 40 women,aged from 5 to 12 years,the average age of 8.0 years.32 of them had been fixed by traditional cross steel needle,and 46 of them had been fixed by Pingle cross steel needle.2cases of occurred elbow varus,1 case of nail crossing inf ection,2 cases with fracture displacement,1 case of ulnar nerve injury.Results:Postoperative follow-ups ranged from4 to 16 months(mean,9 months).According to the criteria proposed by Flynn humerus condyle fracture,functional recovery of elbow was rated as excellent in 43 cases,good in 26 cases,moderate in 7 and poor in 2 cases.Two groups of operational curative effect,the incidence of postoperative complications were fairly,there was no statistically significant difference between them.(P>0.05).Conclusions:In the treatment of children on the condyle fracture,Pingle cross steel is safer,and operational time is less than traditional cross steel needle.
作者
白云波
郑挺渠
陈浩
陈汉鑫
徐广建
刘彦勋
贾斌
BAI Yun-bo;ZHENG Qing-qu;CHEN Hao(Deptment of the orthopaedics,Pingle orthopaedics hospital of Shenzhen,Shenzhen 518010)
出处
《中国伤残医学》
2020年第1期14-16,共3页
Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词
肱骨髁上骨折
交叉钢针
平乐半交叉钢针
固定
Curative effect
Children condyle fracture
Traditional cross needle fixed
Pingle cross steel needle fixed