摘要
犯罪认定是一个动态的价值判断过程,司法三段论是这一判断过程的逻辑体现,在寻找大前提、确定小前提以及大小前提涵摄判断的过程中,犯罪构成理论并不能发挥实际的作用,因为犯罪的认定与犯罪构成理论之间并不具有必然的关联性,采取何种犯罪论体系也不会影响犯罪认定的结果。犯罪构成理论只是针对刑法规定的犯罪成立条件进行理论解读和体系建构的结果,作为解释结论它被解释对象和解释主体的前见所决定,在解释对象即刑法规定不变的前提下,不同的犯罪构成理论体系只是不同解释主体从不同逻辑前提出发所作的不同解释选择。
Crime identification is a dynamic process of value judgment. Judicial syllogism is the logical embodiment of this process. In the process of seeking for the major premise,determining the minor premise and the size premise, the theory of criminal constitution can not play a practical role, because there is no correlation between the crime identification and the theory of criminal constitution, and then, what kind of criminal constitution theory system should be adopted that does not affect the result of crime determination. The theory of criminal constitution is only the result of theoretical interpretation and system construction of the content of the crime stipulated in criminal law. As the conclusion of interpretation, it is decided by the foresight of the object and the subject of the interpretation. If the criminal law is unchanged, different theoretical systems of constitution of crime are just different interpretations choose made by different subjects from different logical premises.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期161-169,共9页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
犯罪构成理论
犯罪认定
实践性
司法三段论
the theory of constitution of crime
crime identification
practicality
judicial syllogism