期刊文献+

自我监控、互惠机会与考核目的对绩效评价结果的影响——一项准实验研究

Effects of Self-monitoring,Reciprocal Chance and Appraisal Purpose on Performance Evaluation Results:A Auasi Experimental Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 绩效考核是人力资源管理的重要工作,考核结果出现偏差是绩效评价常见的问题。从评价者人格特质和考核情境因素入手,分析评价者的心理过程和行为表现,为理解考核结果偏差提供了新的视角。以学生评教准实验模拟绩效评价活动,数据分析表明:评价者自我监控水平、评价者和被评价者之间的互惠机会、评价目的对评价结果有独立的显著影响;自我监控水平和互惠机会、自我监控水平和考核目的、自我监控水平、互惠机会和考核目的对评价结果有交互影响;高自我监控水平的评价者,在有互惠机会和管理性考核时,有更多的高评行为。研究证实了评价者人格特质和考核情境因素对考核结果的主效应和交互效应,对指导绩效考核实践有一定的价值。 Performance appraisal is an important work in human resource management,and the deviation of the appraisal result is a common problem in performance evaluation.By analyzing the evaluator′s psychological process and behavior from the view of evaluator′s personality traits and contextual factors,this paper provides a new perspective for understanding the deviation of assessment results.This study utilized the students’evaluation of teaching to simulate performance appraisal activities.The data analysis shows that,evaluator′s level of self-monitoring,opportunities for reciprocity between rater and ratee,purpose of evaluation have significant independent effect on appraisal results,self monitoring level and reciprocal chance,self monitoring level and appraisal purpose,self monitoring level,reciprocal chance and appraisal purpose have interactive effects on evaluation results.The raters with high self-monitoring level have more lenient rating behaviors when they have reciprocal chance and administration evaluation purpose.The research confirms that the raters’personality traits and appraisal context have independent and interactive effects on the result of the assessment,which has certain value in guiding practice of performance appraisal.
作者 张光进 刘智强 ZHANG Guangjin;LIU Zhiqiang(Public Administration School,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,China;Management School,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China)
出处 《上海管理科学》 2020年第1期82-88,共7页 Shanghai Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71402172,71832004) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(CUGW150403)。
关键词 绩效考核 评价者人格特质 考核情境 交互效应 performance appraisal rater’s personality appraisal context interaction effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献95

  • 1陈学军,王重鸣.内隐绩效模型对绩效评估一致性的效应分析[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):212-214. 被引量:8
  • 2戴冬冬.中国文化对绩效评估的影响分析[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(5):345-348. 被引量:10
  • 3周浩,龙立荣.绩效考核中宽大效应的成因及控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):806-813. 被引量:14
  • 4Boswell W. R., Boudreau J. W.. Seperating the Developmental and Evaluative Performance Appraisal Uses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2002, 16(3): 391-412.
  • 5McNerney D. J.. Improved Performance Appraisals: Process of Elimination. HRFocus, 1995, (7): 5.
  • 6Murphy K. R., Cleveland J. N.. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-based Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995: Sage Publications.
  • 7Levy P. E., Williams J. R.. The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: Review and Framework for the Future. Journal of management, 2004, 30(6): 881-905.
  • 8Cleveland J. N., Murphy K. R., Williams R. E.. Multiple Uses of Performance Appraisal: Prevalence and Correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(1): 130-135.
  • 9Meyer H. H., Kay E., French J. R. P., Jr. Split Roles in Performance Appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 1965, (43): 123-129.
  • 10Mckenna E., Beech N.. Human Resource Management. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:116—127.

共引文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部