iRoot BP Plus和MTA用于年轻恒牙直接盖髓临床效果评价

Clinical Evaluation of iRoot BP Plus and MTA for Direct Fixation of Young Permanent Teeth

目的:评估i Root BP Plus与MTA应用在年轻恒牙直接盖髓中的临床效果。方法:对本医院接受直接盖髓治疗的62例患者(62颗年轻恒牙)纳入实验资料,选自2016年4月~2018年7月,随机双盲法实施分组,一组纳入31例患者(31颗年轻恒牙),观察组采用iRoot BP Plus直接盖髓方法,对照组采用MTA直接盖髓方法,比较两组盖髓成功总统计率、随访3个月时钙化桥形成总统计率、盖髓操作时间。结果:观察组盖髓成功总统计率对比对照组计算数值,未证明数据值之间统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组钙化桥形成总统计率对比对照组计算数值,未证明数据值之间统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组盖髓操作时间短于对照组计算数值,证明数据值之间统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对年轻恒牙采取iRoot BP Plus直接盖髓的效果较MTA更优。

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of iRoot BP Plus and MTA in the direct application of young permanent teeth. Methods: Sixty-two patients(62 young permanent teeth) who underwent direct pulp capping in our hospital were enrolled in the study. They were selected from April 2016 to July 2018, and were randomly divided into two groups. One group included 31 patients( 31 young permanent teeth), the experimental group used iRoot BP Plus direct pulp capping method, and the control group used MTA direct capping method to compare the total statistical success rate of the two sets of capping pulp, the total statistical rate of calcification bridge formation at the follow-up of 3 months, cover Pulp operation time. Results: The total statistical success rate of the experimental group was compared with that of the control group. The statistical significance of the data was not confirmed(P>0.05). The total statistical rate of the calcification bridge formation in the experimental group was compared with the control group, and the data value was not proved. Statistical significance(P>0.05);the operation time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, which proved the statistical significance between the data values(P<0.05). Conclusion: Take on young permanent teeth iRoot BP Plus has a better effect than the MTA.