改良小儿外耳道冲洗器在小儿耵聍患者中的效果观察

Observation on the Effect of Improved Pediatric External Ear Canal Irrigator in Pediatric Patients

目的:探讨改良小儿外耳道冲洗器在小儿耵聍患者治疗中的效果。方法:搜集2017年3月~2018年6月在本院耳鼻喉科接受治疗的123例小儿耵聍患者的病例资料进行回顾性分析,将其中应用普通外耳道冲洗器治疗的60例患儿作为对照组,63例已应用改良外耳道冲洗器的患儿作为观察组,观察两种外耳道冲洗器治疗后患儿不良反应发生情况,评价两种治疗方式效果。结果:观察组患儿眩晕1例、疼痛2例、外耳道损伤1例、鼓膜损伤1例、均无呕吐,发生率7.9%低于对照组患儿眩晕3例、呕吐2例、疼痛5例、外耳道损伤2例,鼓膜损伤1例,发生率21.7%,且P<0.05。结论:改良小儿外耳道冲洗器对比普通冲洗器治疗中不良反应发生率低,是耵聍患儿一种更好的临床治疗方式。

Objective: To explore the effect of improved pediatric external ear canal irrigator in the treatment of pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 123 patients with Erji who were treated in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology from March 2017 to June 2018. Sixty children treated with ordinary external ear canal irrigators were collected. In the control group, 63 children who had been modified with external ear canal irrigators were used as the observation group to observe the occurrence of adverse reactions after treatment with two external ear canal irrigators, and to evaluate the effects of the two treatment methods. Results: There were 1 case of dizziness, 2 cases of pain, 1 case of external auditory canal injury, 1 case of eardrum injury, and no vomiting in the observation group. The incidence rate was 7.9% lower than that in the control group of 3 cases of dizziness, 2 cases of vomiting, 5 cases of pain, There were 2 cases of external auditory canal injury and 1 case of tympanic membrane injury, the incidence was 21.7%, and P<0.05. Conclusion: Improved pediatric external ear canal irrigator has a lower incidence of adverse reactions compared with ordinary irrigator, which is a better clinical treatment for children with palpitations.