期刊文献+

基于《中国英语能力等级量表》的高职学生英语写作能力调查研究 被引量:8

A Survey of Vocational College Students’ English Writing Ability Based on the "Chinese English Competence Scale"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以最近发展区理论为指导,运用《中国英语能力等级量表》中的有关写作表达能力描写参数框架,采用定量和定性研究相结合的方法,探究高职学生英语写作能力发展态势,旨在为今后高职英语写作教学指明方向。通过调查研究发现,大部分高职学生英语写作能力可在三级至四级区间发展,少部分学生写作能力可达到五级水平。据此,英语教师采取有针对性的系列写作教学措施,既要强化高职学生写作认知过程,也要加强高职学生语言能力水平提升的基础性训练,以实现高职学生英语写作能力的目标要求。 Guided by the theory of zone of proximal development,this paper explores the development trend of English writing ability of higher vocational students by using the descriptive parameter framework of the"Chinese English Competence Scale"and the method of combining quantitative and qualitative research,aiming at pointing out the direction of English writing teaching in higher vocational colleges in the future.Through investigation and research,it is found that most vocational college students'English writing ability can be developed in the three to four levels,while a few students'writing ability can reach the five levels.Accordingly,English teachers should take a series of targeted teaching measures to strengthen the cognitive process of higher vocational students'writing,as well as the basic training to improve their language ability,so as to achieve the goal of higher vocational students'English writing ability.
作者 安维彧 吴媛 AN Wei-yu;WU Yuan(Tianjin Vocational Institute,Tianjin 300410,China)
机构地区 天津职业大学
出处 《教育教学论坛》 2020年第7期381-385,共5页 Education And Teaching Forum
基金 2018年7月第九批“中国外语教育基金项目”中“基于成果导向教育理念的高职公共英语课程设计改革与实践研究”(一般课题,课题编号:ZGWYJYJJ2018B101)阶段性研究成果之一
关键词 英语能力 等级量表 高职学生 English competence grade scale higher vocational students
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1戴炜栋.构建具有中国特色的英语教学“一条龙”体系[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(5):322-327. 被引量:956
  • 2张雪梅.大学英语写作教学现状之调查[J].外语界,2006(5):28-32. 被引量:142
  • 3韩宝成.国外语言能力量表述评[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(6):443-450. 被引量:118
  • 4Barrett, H. 2006. Using electronic portfolios for classroom assessment [-J]. Connected News-letter 13(2).. 4-6.
  • 5Black, P. &D. Wiliam. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning FJ]. Assessment in Educa- tion : Principles, Policy & Practice 5: 7-74.
  • 6Brown, J. 1996. Testing in Language Programs [M]. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall Regents.
  • 7Clune, W. 2001. Towards a theory of standards-based reform: The case of nine NSF state- wide systematic initiatives [A]. In S. Fuhrman (ed.). From the Capitol to the Class- room : Standards-based Reform in the States [C]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 13-38.
  • 8Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages : Learn- ing, Teaching, Assessment [M]. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  • 9Cowie, B. & B. Bell. 1999. A model of formative assessment in science education [J]. Assess- ment in Education : Principles, Policy Practice 6: 101-116.
  • 10Deville, C. & M. Chalhoub-Deville. 2011. Accountability-assessment under No Child Left Behind.. Agenda, practice, and future [J]. Langauge Testing 38.. 307-321.

共引文献143

同被引文献82

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部