摘要
我国民族研究曾深受"阶级分析法"和"民族识别"的影响。这有其历史原因,也有其成效。不过,"阶级分析法"被教条化后,严重制约了民族研究。其后,"文化解释法"被广泛用于民族研究,也不乏成效。但是,民族研究因过于倚重此法,无法全面涵盖当代中国经济、社会、文化与政治转型的实践经验,陷入了新的制约。由此,在新时期,以透视实践经验为导向的社会科学视角,应是民族研究值得探索的方向。
China’s ethnic research has been deeply influenced by"class analysis"and"ethnic identification".This has its historical reasons and has not gone fruitless. However,the method of"class analysis",when dogmatized,severely restricted ethnic studies. After that,the method of"cultural interpretation"has been widely used,not without some achievement. However,because ethnic studies rely too much on this method,they cannot fully cover the practical experiences of the economic,social,cultural,and political transformation in contemporary China,which means that they are also restricted,but in a different way. In the current new era,the perspective of social science oriented by practical experience is a direction worth exploring for ethnic studies.
作者
谭同学
Tan Tongxue(National Centre for Borderlands Ethnic Studies in Southwest China,Yunnan University)
出处
《开放时代》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期49-62,M0004,共15页
Open Times
基金
云南大学“民族学一流学科建设”项目“新时代边疆汉族社会转型与治理研究”(项目编号:2019SY046)的阶段性成果
关键词
民族研究
阶级分析
文化解释
实践社会科学
ethnic study
class analysis
cultural interpretation
social science of practice