期刊文献+

基于模糊层次分析法和证据推理的铁路应急预案评价研究 被引量:19

Research on evaluation of railway emergency plan based on Fuzzy-AHP and evidence reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决铁路应急预案评价中存在的不确定性问题,提出基于证据推理的应急预案评价方法,从完整性、可操作性、针对性、协作性和可持续性5个维度构建应急预案评价指标体系;采用模糊层次分析法对指标权重进行计算,并通过证据推理对专家的评价数据进行证据合成,得到各预案评价等级分布;将各预案评价等级分布与评价效用结合,最终得到各预案评价排序。结果表明:实例分析表明,提出的评价方法对于处理不确定多属性的评价问题具有较强的可行性和适用性。 Aiming at the uncertainty problem in the evaluation of railway emergency plan,a method of emergency plan evaluation based on the evidence reasoning was put forward,and an index system of emergency plan evaluation was constructed from five dimensions of integrity,operability,pertinence,collaboration and sustainability.The weights of indexes were calculated by using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method(Fuzzy-AHP),and the evidence synthesis was carried out on the evaluation data of experts through the evidence reasoning.The distribution of evaluation grades for each plan was obtained and combined with the evaluation utility,and the evaluation ranking of each plan was finally obtained.The case study shows that the proposed evaluation method has strong feasibility and applicability for dealing with uncertain multi-attribute evaluation problems.
作者 孙延浩 张琦 张芸鹏 SUN Yanhao;ZHANG Qi;ZHANG Yunpeng(Postgraduate Department,China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited,Beijing 100081,China;Signal&Communication Research Institute,China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited,Beijing 100081,China;National Research Center of Railway Intelligence Transportation System Engineering Technology,China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期123-129,共7页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会-中国铁路总公司高速铁路基础研究联合基金项目(U1834211)
关键词 铁路运输 证据推理 模糊层次分析法 应急预案 railway transportation evidence reasoning Fuzzy-AHP emergency plan
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

  • 1孙颖,池宏,祁明亮,贾传亮.基于改进的多属性群决策方法的突发事件[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(z1):153-156. 被引量:9
  • 2张李义,汪小芬.利用层次分析法综合评估信息系统[J].情报杂志,2005,24(1):83-84. 被引量:16
  • 3李永,胡向红,乔箭.改进的模糊层次分析法[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,35(1):11-12. 被引量:181
  • 4肖凡,刘忠,黄金才.作战方案效能评估指标研究[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2006,20(2):41-45. 被引量:28
  • 5JU Yan-bing, WANG Ai-hua. Emergency alternative evaluation under group decision makers : A method of incorporating DS/AHP with extended TOPSIS[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2012,39(1) :1 315 - 1 323.
  • 6Serafim Opricovic,Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004,156(2) : 445 - 455.
  • 7Serafim Opricovic, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking method[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 178(2) : 514 - 529.
  • 8F Herrera, L Mam~nez, P J S~inchez. Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making[J].European Journal of Operational,2005,168(1) : 115 - 132.
  • 9F Herrera, L Martllaez. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2000,8(6) :746 - 752.
  • 10WEI Gui-wu. Extension of TOPSIS method for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information[J].Knowledge and Information Systems,2010,25(3) :623 - 634.

共引文献192

同被引文献201

引证文献19

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部