期刊文献+

经腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺手术与传统开放性甲状腺手术的对比研究 被引量:6

Comparative Study of Transaxillary Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery and Traditional Open Thyroid Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察经腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺手术治疗效果。方法选取2013年6月-2017年8月100例甲状腺手术患者,随机分为观察组与对照组,各50例,对照组行开放性手术,观察组行经腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺切除手术治疗,比较两组疗效。结果手术时间对比,观察组为(122.94±50.48)min,长于对照组的(84.82±17.30)min﹙t=5.052,P<0.05﹚;观察组术中出血量、住院时间分别为(30.41±17.48)mL、(3.98±0.93)d,均低于对照组的(87.01±43.98)m L、(4.81±1.62)d﹙t=8.457、3.147,P<0.05﹚;疗效对比,观察组(98.0%)高于对照组(84.0%)﹙χ^2=7.030,P<0.05﹚。结论经腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺手术,治疗效果较好,值得推广。 Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic thyroid surgery through axillary approach.Methods 100 patients with thyroid surgery from June 2013 to August 2017 were randomLy divided into observation group and control group,each with 50 cases.The control group underwent open surgery,and the observation group underwent axillary endoscopic thyroidectomy,compare the efficacy of the two groups.Results Comparison of operation time,the observation group was(122.94±50.48)min,which was longer than the control group(84.82±17.30)min﹙t=5.052,P<0.05﹚;the intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay were(30.41±17.48)mL and(3.98±0.93)d,which were lower than(87.01±43.98)m L and(4.81±1.62)d in the control group﹙t=8.457,3.147,P<0.05﹚;compared with the efficacy,the observation group(98.0%)was higher than the control group(84.0%)﹙χ^2=7.030,P<0.05﹚.Conclusion The axillary approach for endoscopic thyroid surgery has better treatment effect and is worth popularizing.
作者 叶大才 范显文 陈潇 李小妍 梁明飞 华若岳 莫辉 江小龙 YE Da-cai;FAN Xian-wen;CHEN Xiao;LI Xiao-yan;LIANG Ming-fei;HUA Ruo-yue;MO Hui;JIANG Xiao-long(Department of General Surgery,Wuzhou Workers Hospital,Wuzhou,Guangxi,543001 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2019年第24期17-19,共3页 Systems Medicine
基金 广西梧州市科学研究与技术开发项目(201502077)
关键词 甲状腺疾病 腔镜甲状腺手术 开放性甲状腺手术 Thyroid disease Endoscopic thyroid surgery Open thyroid surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献75

共引文献144

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部