摘要
对澳大利亚通讯数据留存与调取制度所涉及的主要法律规范进行分析,结合相关事件和文献资料的梳理,发现澳大利亚通讯数据留存与调取制度以通讯数据收集较秘密获取通讯内容更不具权利干预性为前提假设,存在留存通讯数据范围和调取通讯数据主体不确定性、留存期限设置不合理、通讯数据调取权控制不足等问题。我国应借鉴澳大利亚通讯数据留存与调取制度的经验、教训,重视通讯数据留存与调取的权利干预性、更新通讯数据留存与调取的法律规范、完善通讯数据留存和调取制度。
By analyzing the main legal norms involved in the Australian telecommunication data retention and access system,and combining with the combing of related events and literature,we can conclude that the Australian telecommunication data retention and access system is based on the assumption that the telecommunication data collection is less entitled to intervene than secretly obtaining the telecommunication content.And there are some problems,such as the range of retained telecommunication data and the main body of accessing telecommunication data are uncertain,the setting of retention period is unreasonable,and the control of the telecommunication data access right is insufficient.We should draw lessons from the experience and lessons of the Australian telecommunication data retention and access system,and pay more attention to the right-to-interference of the retention and access of telecommunication data.In addition,we should update the legal norms of telecommunication data retention and access,and improve the retention and access system of telecommunication data.
作者
吴常青
李静雅
李晨蕾
Wu Changqing;Li Jingya;Li Chenlei(Law School,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134;Railway Transportation Procuratorate of Tianjin,Tianjin 300142)
出处
《信息资源管理学报》
CSSCI
2020年第1期75-81,110,共8页
Journal of Information Resources Management
基金
中华人民共和国司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“侦查机关调取非内容性电子数据规制研究”(18SFB2030)的研究成果之一。
关键词
通讯数据
数据留存
数据调取
数据保护
数据隐私
澳大利亚
Telecommunication data
Data retention
Data access
Data protection
Data privacy
Australia