期刊文献+

环境行政机关败诉案件实证研究

Empirical Research on Losing Cases of Environmental Administrative
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对我国环境行政机关行政诉讼败诉案件进行实证研究,对于构建我国环境行政法律风险防控体系,降低行政机关行政诉讼败诉率,促进环境行政机关依法行政,提高环境行政机关的公信力和公众认同度,提高工作效率,降低环境行政管理成本具有重要意义。从年度、行政行为类型、地区等不同维度对败诉案件进行实证分析的结论表明,在环境行政诉讼案件中,行政机关平均败诉率较高,且近年来有不断上升的趋势。相关制度不完善,行政机关执法不规范,多数部门未建立环境行政风险防范体系是行政机关败诉的主要原因。通过提升执法人员法律素养、加强内部风险管理、建立健全诉后评估与追责机制等措施构建环境行政风险防范体系,可以有效降低环境行政机关败诉率。 An empirical study of the losing cases of the environmental administrative in China is significant to build a legal risk prevention and control system,reduce the losing rate,promote the environmental law administration,improve the credibility and public recognition,improve the work efficiency,and reduce the environmental administrative management costs.The empirical results of the environmental administrative litigation cases analyzed by the factors of years and the administrative action types as well as the regions show that the average losing rate is relatively high,with an increasing trend in recent years.The situation mainly results from the imperfect related systems,the irregularities in the enforcement of administrative and most departments failing to establish environmental administrative risk prevention systems.Hence,it needs to build an environmental administrative risk prevention system by some methods,such as improving the legal literacy of law enforcement officers,strengthening the internal risk management,and establishing a mechanism of evaluation and accountability after litigation.These methods can reduce the losing rate of the environmental administrative effectively.
作者 晋海 康欣颖 王彬 JIN Hai;KANG Xinying;WANG Bin(Hohai University School of Law,Nanjing 211100,China;Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy,Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《环境保护科学》 CAS 2020年第1期7-13,共7页 Environmental Protection Science
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费项目专项资金(2018B21614) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目专项资金(2019B60814) 生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心2018年财政预算项目对外委托课题(20182102) 我国环境行政处罚案件实证研究(SJKY19-0391)资助
关键词 环境行政机关 行政诉讼 败诉法律风险 实证研究 Environmental Administrative Administrative Litigation Legal Risk of Losing Case Empirical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1吴卫星.印度环境公益诉讼制度及其启示[J].华东政法大学学报,2010,13(5):66-74. 被引量:27
  • 2[美]E.博登海默,邓正来译.《法理学:法律哲学与法律方法》,中国政法大学出版社,2004年版,第330页.
  • 3黄学贤.行政诉讼调解若干热点问题探讨[J].法学,2007(11):43-49. 被引量:29
  • 4MICHAEL G F, RAJA A V. Effectiveness ofenvironmental public interest litigation in India:determining the key variables [J]. Fordham EnvironmentalLaw Review, 2010(21):101-130.
  • 5SATHE S P. Judicial activism: the Indian experience [J].Washington University Journal of Low & Policy, 2001, 29(6): 84-87.
  • 6CUNNINGHAM C. Public interest litigation in the supremecourt of India: a study in light of American experience[J]. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 1987(29):494-521.
  • 7SHYAM D, ARIMIN R. Environmental law and policy inInida: cases, materials and statues [M]. New Delhi:Oxford University Press, 2001:136-220.
  • 8DAM S. Green laws for better health: the past that was andthe future that maybe.reflections from the Indianexperience [J]. Georgetown International EnvironmentalLaw Review, 2003.2004(16):593-615.
  • 9MICHAEL R A, ANEES A. Assessing environmentaldamage under Indian law [J]. Review of EuropenCommunity & International Environmental Law, 1996, 5(5):335-341.
  • 10VENKAT I. The supreme court of India, in judicialactivism in common law supreme courts [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2008:121-168.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部