期刊文献+

个体化3D打印模型在骨科术前模拟中的应用 被引量:2

Application of individualized 3D printing model in orthopedic preoperative simulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨个体化3D打印模型应用于骨科术前模拟的优势。方法将320例我院骨科手术患者分为3D打印组和普通影像组应用于实验,对两组患者的手术用时、术中出血量、术后功能评分变化、术后康复时间以及内植物选择的合理性于术后12个月进行全面评估。结果3D打印组与普通影像组进行对比:手术平均时间明显缩短(t=2.86,P<0.01);术中出血量明显减少(t=3.19,P<0.01);围手术期在使用相同康复方法的前提下,康复时间平均缩短3.2 d,,术后功能评分变化无明显差异;内植物选择更加准确可靠,节约术前准备时间及手术预算。结论个体化3D打印模型与传统术前准备(普通影像学资料)相比,前者应用于骨科术前模拟具有显著优势。 Objective To explore the advantages of utilizing individualized 3 D printing model in orthopedic preoperative simulation. Methods Three hundred and twenty patients with orthopedic surgery in our hospital were divided into 3 D printing group and normal imaging group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative functional score change, postoperative recovery time and internal plant selection were compared between the two groups. Rationality was fully evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. Results The patients in 3 D printing model group had shorter operation(t=2.86,P<0.01) and smaller bleeding amount(t=3.19, P<0.01). In addition, their recovery duration was also shortened by 3.2 days under the condition of receiving the same treatment. There was no significant difference in postoperative functional scores;Furthermore, the selection of internal plants was more accurate and reliable, saving preoperative preparation time and operating budget. Conclusion Compared with traditional preoperative preparation(general imaging data), the individualized 3 D printing model has significant advantages in preoperative simulation of orthopedics.
作者 付艳红 高薇 李世明 侯天胤 FU Yan-hong;GAO Wei;LI Shi-ming;HOU Tian-yin(Department of Operating Room,The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150001,China)
出处 《哈尔滨医科大学学报》 CAS 2019年第4期418-420,共3页 Journal of Harbin Medical University
关键词 3D打印 个体化模型 骨科 术前模拟 3D printing individualized model orthopedics preoperative simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1陈振兵,洪光祥,王发斌.上肢功能评定表[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2004,18(6):520-521. 被引量:112
  • 2吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003..
  • 3Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M,et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975- 2010. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute [EB/ OL]. [2013 - 12 - 121. http://seer, cancer, gov/csr/1975_2010/. Accessed August 1,2013.
  • 4Campbell K,Pusic A,Zucker D,et al. A prospective model of care for breast cancer rehabilitation: Function[J]. Cancer, 2012,118 : 2300 - 2311.
  • 5Hayes SC,Johansson K, Stout NL, et al. Upper - body morbidity after breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 2012,118 : 2237 - 2249.
  • 6Levy EW, Pfalzer LA, Danoff J, et al. Predictors of functional shoulder recovery at 1 and 12 months after breast cancer surgery [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2012,134 : 315 - 324.
  • 7Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, et al. Outcome evalua- tion measures for wrist and hand= Which one to choose? [J]. Int Orthop,2008,32:1 - 6.
  • 8Beaton DE, Katz J N, Fossel AH et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the DASH out- come measure in different regions of the upper extremity[J]. J Hand Ther, 2001,14 .- 128 - 142.
  • 9Beaton DE,Wright JG,Katz JN. Development of the quick DASH:Com- parison of three item- reduction approaches[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005,87:1038- 1046.
  • 10Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research= Principal and methods[M]. Seventh Edition. Philadelphial: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003:423.

共引文献182

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部